Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Buy and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. PRPAX (568M). PRPAX (5.75) and RMLPX (5.73) have matching dividends . PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs RMLPX (7 years). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMLPX (7.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.56 vs. RMLPX (37.91). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 127.60 vs. PRPAX (96.41).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.710 | 7.300 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 568M | 1.16B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 5.73 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.56 | 37.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.34 | 100.24 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 127.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.86 | N/A | - |