Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Buy and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. PRPAX (532M). PRPAX (5.75) and RMLPX (5.73) have matching dividends . PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs RMLPX (7 years). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMLPX (7.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.76 vs. RMLPX (25.41). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 125.58 vs. PRPAX (91.06).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.506 | 4.272 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 532M | 1.13B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 5.73 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.76 | 25.41 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.91 | 87.79 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.06 | 125.58 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.96 | N/A | - |