Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs RMLPX
PRPAX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. RMLPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and RMLPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. PRPAX (544M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: PRPAX (52.96) vs RMLPX (5.08). PRPAX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs RMLPX (7 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). PRPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMLPX: PRPAX (1000) vs RMLPX (2500). PRPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.77 vs. RMLPX (15.83). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 381.77 vs. PRPAX (256.28).
| PRPAX | RMLPX | PRPAX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.10 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.10 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.542 | 6.803 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 1.17B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.96 | 5.08 | 1,042% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 15.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.11 | 69.10 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.28 | 381.77 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...