Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. PRPAX (544M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (52.96) vs SMFPX (3.38). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.13) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. PRPAX (24.77). PRPAX (256.28) and SMFPX (245.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.13 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.13 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.542 | 7.802 | 97% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 1.35B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.96 | 3.38 | 1,567% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 30.83 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.11 | 59.36 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.28 | 245.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.53 | 28.92 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...