Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. PRPAX (508M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (52.43) vs SMFPX (3.42). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRPAX (14.26) and SMFPX (13.72) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 169.72 vs. SMFPX (154.53).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.690 | 3.086 | 152% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 508M | 1.25B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.43 | 3.42 | 1,533% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.26 | 13.72 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.93 | 57.39 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 169.72 | 154.53 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.85 | 55.36 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement