Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. PRPAX (503M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (56.38) vs SMFPX (3.64). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.08 vs. PRPAX (16.91). PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 158.07 vs. SMFPX (149.25).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.119 | -1.026 | -12% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 1.23B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 56.38 | 3.64 | 1,550% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.91 | 18.08 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 56.78 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.07 | 149.25 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 16.90 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...