Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. PRPAX (568M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (5.75) vs SMFPX (4.75). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. PRPAX (40.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.95 vs. PRPAX (44.56). SMFPX (99.93) and PRPAX (96.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.710 | 8.949 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 568M | 1.35B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.75 | 4.75 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.56 | 50.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.34 | 93.18 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.41 | 99.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.86 | 37.55 | 119% |