Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. PRPAX (511M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (54.37) vs SMFPX (3.50). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX (21.67) and PRPAX (21.01) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 133.18 vs. SMFPX (115.36).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.241 | 1.906 | 170% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.26B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 54.37 | 3.50 | 1,553% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.01 | 21.67 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.08 | 45.23 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.18 | 115.36 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.32 | 24.37 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement