Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMFPX
PRPAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. PRPAX (510M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: PRPAX (52.57) vs SMFPX (3.40). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: PRPAX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRPAX (17.69) and SMFPX (17.58) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPAX return over 5 years is better than : 149.79 vs. SMFPX (134.68).
| PRPAX | SMFPX | PRPAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 2.12 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 2.15 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.116 | 2.302 | 179% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 1.28B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.57 | 3.40 | 1,547% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.69 | 17.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.86 | 51.06 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 149.79 | 134.68 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.05 | 45.86 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement