Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. PRPAX (544M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (52.96) vs SMRPX (4.35). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.06). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.26 vs. PRPAX (24.77). SMRPX (265.12) and PRPAX (256.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.06 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.06 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.542 | 8.094 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 1.35B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 52.96 | 4.35 | 1,217% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 32.26 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.11 | 64.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 256.28 | 265.12 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...