Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. PRPAX (511M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (54.37) vs SMRPX (4.58). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.04 vs. PRPAX (21.01). PRPAX (133.18) and SMRPX (127.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.02 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.05 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.241 | 2.358 | 137% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 511M | 1.26B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 54.37 | 4.58 | 1,186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.01 | 23.04 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.08 | 49.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 133.18 | 127.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement