Ad is loading...
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a StrongBuy and SMRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. PRPAX (503M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (56.38) vs SMRPX (4.68). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.35 vs. PRPAX (16.91). SMRPX (162.52) and PRPAX (158.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.02 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.05 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.119 | -0.668 | -18% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 1.23B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 56.38 | 4.68 | 1,205% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.91 | 19.35 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.28 | 61.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.07 | 162.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers