Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison
Open Charts PRPAX vs SMRPX
PRPAX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRPAX vs. SMRPX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPAX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.41B vs. PRPAX (570M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: PRPAX (8.69) vs SMRPX (3.76). PRPAX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: PRPAX (13 years) vs SMRPX (11 years). PRPAX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.03). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. PRPAX (21.00). PRPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: PRPAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). PRPAX (26.28) and SMRPX (25.38) have marching annual gain over last year. SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 158.16 vs. PRPAX (143.04).
| PRPAX | SMRPX | PRPAX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.99 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.03 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.565 | 23.248 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 1.41B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.69 | 3.76 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.28 | 25.38 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.70 | 90.59 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 143.04 | 158.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.32 | 142.05 | 89% |