Ad is loading...
PRPS
Price
$1.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 8 closing price
QFIN
Price
$35.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
116 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PRPS vs QFIN

Header iconPRPS vs QFIN Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs QFINBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$1.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$828
CapitalizationN/A
Qifu Technology
Price$35.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.26M
CapitalizationN/A
PRPS vs QFIN Comparison Chart
Loading...
QFIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. QFIN commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and QFIN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (PRPS: $1.03 vs. QFIN: $35.21)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and QFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 122% vs. QFIN: 73%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $1.62M vs. QFIN: $2.96B
PRPS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.62M. QFIN’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQFIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QFIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QFIN is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QFIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QFIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QFIN (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +19.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

QFIN is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.64% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QFIN($2.96B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($1.62M). QFIN YTD gains are higher at: 134.150 vs. PRPS (-41.143). PRPS has less debt than QFIN: PRPS (32.3K) vs QFIN (756M). QFIN has higher revenues than PRPS: QFIN (13.1B) vs PRPS (3.03M).
PRPSQFINPRPS / QFIN
Capitalization1.62M2.96B0%
EBITDA-1.65MN/A-
Gain YTD-41.143134.150-31%
P/E RatioN/A5.40-
Revenue3.03M13.1B0%
Total Cash424KN/A-
Total Debt32.3K756M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS vs QFIN: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
QFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9835
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QFIN's Valuation (18) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (46) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRPS (98) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's SMR Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRPS (91) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QFIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZCCX39.940.87
+2.23%
DWS Small Cap Core C
ABSZX24.480.39
+1.62%
AB Discovery Value Z
WFIVX34.140.23
+0.68%
FT Wilshire 5000 Index Invmt
FNCMX241.770.14
+0.06%
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
FSSEX10.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Intl Eq

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and VEL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and VEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
N/A
VEL - PRPS
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
ASHTY - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
QFIN - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
TBCRF - PRPS
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
GHLD - PRPS
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More

QFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFIN has been loosely correlated with FINV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QFIN jumps, then FINV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QFIN
1D Price
Change %
QFIN100%
-0.11%
FINV - QFIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
LX - QFIN
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
LU - QFIN
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
GDOT - QFIN
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
LC - QFIN
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.23%
More