PRPS
Price
$0.60
Change
+$0.09 (+17.65%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.62M
QFIN
Price
$42.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Updated
Jul 18, 02:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.96B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRPS vs QFIN

Header iconPRPS vs QFIN Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs QFINBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$0.60
Change+$0.09 (+17.65%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.62M
Qifu Technology
Price$42.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.96B
PRPS vs QFIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QFIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. QFIN commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and QFIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (PRPS: $0.49 vs. QFIN: $42.00)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and QFIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 11% vs. QFIN: 138%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $1.62M vs. QFIN: $2.96B
PRPS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.62M. QFIN’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQFIN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QFIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QFIN is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRPS’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QFIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRPS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QFIN is a better buy in the short-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.92% price change this week, while QFIN (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

QFIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.99% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QFIN($2.96B) has a higher market cap than PRPS($1.62M). QFIN YTD gains are higher at: 11.490 vs. PRPS (-53.333). PRPS has less debt than QFIN: PRPS (32.3K) vs QFIN (756M). QFIN has higher revenues than PRPS: QFIN (13.1B) vs PRPS (3.03M).
PRPSQFINPRPS / QFIN
Capitalization1.62M2.96B0%
EBITDA-1.65MN/A-
Gain YTD-53.33311.490-464%
P/E RatioN/A5.40-
Revenue3.03M13.1B0%
Total Cash424KN/A-
Total Debt32.3K756M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS vs QFIN: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
QFIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3870
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QFIN's Valuation (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PRPS (61) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's SMR Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as QFIN (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to QFIN’s over the last 12 months.

QFIN's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100) in the null industry. This means that QFIN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRPSQFIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QFIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MODG9.400.55
+6.21%
Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp
SOL1.930.01
+0.52%
Emeren Group Ltd
CBOE237.840.74
+0.31%
Cboe Global Markets
BCLI1.17-0.03
-2.50%
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics
ECX1.44-0.64
-30.77%
ECARX Holdings

PRPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and VEL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and VEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRPS
1D Price
Change %
PRPS100%
-3.92%
VEL - PRPS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ASHTY - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
QFIN - PRPS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
TBCRF - PRPS
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
GHLD - PRPS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFIN has been loosely correlated with FINV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QFIN jumps, then FINV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QFIN
1D Price
Change %
QFIN100%
+1.52%
FINV - QFIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
LX - QFIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
LU - QFIN
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
YRD - QFIN
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
QD - QFIN
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More