Advertisement
LX vs QFIN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? LexinFintech Holdings (LX) vs. Qfin Holdings (QFIN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Different stages of stress: LX faces a Nasdaq minimum-bid-price notice and guided for a potential third-quarter loss, while QFIN is navigating an industry funding squeeze from a larger, more profitable base.
- Scale and profitability diverge sharply: QFIN's market capitalization and net margin are substantially higher than LX's, giving it a stronger buffer in the current China consumer-credit downturn.
- Risk profiles differ: LX is contending with delisting pressure and shrinking earnings, whereas QFIN's main overhang is securities litigation and softer loan originations rather than capital adequacy.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on trend consistency, profitability, and balance-sheet positioning, QFIN is the favored ticker of the two.
- Explore LX Major News and LX Today's Price Move, as well as QFIN Major News and QFIN Today's Price Move, for the latest updates on each name.
- Discover curated AI-driven strategies on the Trending AI Robots page.
Introduction
Both LexinFintech Holdings (LX) and Qfin Holdings (QFIN) operate at the intersection of China's consumer finance and credit-technology sectors, yet they sit at very different points on the risk-and-reward spectrum. For traders and investors tracking Chinese financial technology names, this stock comparison is relevant because the two companies are exposed to the same macro headwinds — tightening regulation, softer household borrowing, and a funding squeeze across the loan-facilitation industry — while producing divergent results. Understanding their relative performance, market positioning, and balance-sheet resilience helps clarify which name currently offers a more stable risk profile amid an uncertain credit cycle.
LX Overview and Recent Performance
LX, or LexinFintech Holdings, is a Shenzhen-based personal financial services and installment-e-commerce platform. The company has spent recent quarters pivoting toward ecosystem businesses such as installment retail, offline inclusive finance, and fintech-empowerment services, reducing its reliance on traditional online consumer lending. In recent weeks, however, sentiment has been pressured by a sharp deterioration in earnings visibility: second-quarter net income fell roughly 80% year over year, and management guided that the following quarter could swing to a net loss as loan originations contracted.
Compounding these challenges, LX received a Nasdaq notification regarding its minimum bid price requirement, reflecting a share price that has traded near multi-year lows. The company has also shifted its dividend to an annual distribution to preserve capital. These developments have weighed on relative performance, even as the stock's deeply discounted valuation — trading below its reported cash position — continues to attract attention from value-oriented investors.
QFIN Overview and Recent Performance
QFIN, or Qfin Holdings (formerly Qifu Technology), is a Shanghai-based, AI-driven credit-technology platform operating under the Qifu Jietiao brand. The company matches borrowers with financial institutions and offers capital-light platform services, serving more than 160 institutional partners and tens of millions of credit users. In recent market activity, QFIN has shown comparatively better operating stability: second-quarter loan originations declined modestly on a sequential basis, while key risk metrics improved, including a notable drop in its early-delinquency ratio.
Despite this resilience, the stock has not been immune to sector-wide concerns. QFIN faces multiple securities class-action lawsuits filed in recent weeks, and some sell-side firms have trimmed ratings or price targets. Profitability, while down year over year, remains firmly positive, and the company continues to return capital through dividends. The net effect is a name with strong fundamentals but elevated headline and legal risk.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of automated trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and watchlist of symbols. Rather than presenting every available bot, the page highlights the strategies most aligned with current market dynamics, allowing users to evaluate bots by measurable statistics such as win rate, trade frequency, and profitability. Whether you favor short-term momentum or longer-horizon positioning, this resource offers a data-driven way to compare automated approaches. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to see which strategies are currently resonating with the market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between LX and QFIN is scale and profitability. QFIN operates a substantially larger balance sheet and generates meaningfully higher net margins, providing more room to absorb the ongoing contraction in Chinese consumer credit. LX, by comparison, is running a leaner operation that is more sensitive to funding availability, a factor that has driven management to tighten originations and warn of near-term losses.
Growth drivers also diverge. QFIN's core value proposition is its AI-driven credit-decisioning engine and capital-light platform revenue, while LX is increasingly reliant on installment e-commerce and fintech-empowerment services as it de-emphasizes legacy lending. On risk, LX carries the more acute near-term concern: a listing-price compliance issue and shrinking earnings. QFIN's principal overhang is litigation and reputational risk rather than solvency. From a market sentiment standpoint, both stocks trade at single-digit forward earnings multiples, but QFIN's consistent profitability and improving asset-quality metrics offer a more defensible foundation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor QFIN over LX in the current environment. QFIN demonstrates stronger balance-sheet resilience, sustained profitability, and improving credit-quality indicators, even as the broader industry contracts. LX, while trading at an extreme discount, is contending with a more uncertain earnings trajectory, a Nasdaq compliance notice, and guided losses. This probabilistic assessment favors the name with more durable fundamentals, though both stocks remain exposed to shared regulatory and macro risks that warrant continued monitoring.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LX is a StrongBuy and QFIN is a StrongBuy.
LX in +8.82% Uptrend, rising for three consecutive days on November 09, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where LX advanced for three days, in 182 of 243 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LX's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 25 of 34 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LX as a result. In 79 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
LX broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for LX entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 1 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.009) is normal, around the industry mean (3.902). P/E Ratio (0.107) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.401). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.040) is also within normal values, averaging (3.918). LX has a moderately high Dividend Yield (1.138) as compared to the industry average of (0.189). P/S Ratio (0.071) is also within normal values, averaging (5.901).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. LX’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LX’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
QFIN's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QFIN turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where QFIN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 44 of 56 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QFIN's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 50 of 65 cases where QFIN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
Following a +2.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QFIN advanced for three days, in 186 of 253 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QFIN as a result. In 78 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QFIN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for QFIN entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 2 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.027) is normal, around the industry mean (3.902). P/E Ratio (0.188) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.401). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.050) is also within normal values, averaging (3.918). Dividend Yield (0.328) settles around the average of (0.189) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.527) is also within normal values, averaging (5.901).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 22 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QFIN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QFIN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
LX | QFIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 87 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LX's Valuation (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as QFIN (2). This means that LX’s stock grew similarly to QFIN’s over the last 12 months.
LX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as QFIN (100). This means that LX’s stock grew similarly to QFIN’s over the last 12 months.
QFIN's SMR Rating (5) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LX (70). This means that QFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LX’s over the last 12 months.
QFIN's Price Growth Rating (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LX (88). This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to LX’s over the last 12 months.
QFIN's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LX (97). This means that QFIN’s stock grew similarly to LX’s over the last 12 months.
| LX | QFIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while QFIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- LX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QFIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QFIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QFIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LX (@Savings Banks) experienced а -6.18% price change this week, while QFIN (@Savings Banks) price change was -5.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
LX is expected to report earnings on Nov 23, 2026.
QFIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (-3.59% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
Advertisement
LX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LX has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LX jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
QFIN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QFIN has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QFIN jumps, then LX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QFIN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QFIN | 100% | -3.01% | ||
| LX - QFIN | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| LU - QFIN | 36% Loosely correlated | -6.80% | ||
| AER - QFIN | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| SNFCA - QFIN | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| OBDC - QFIN | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
More | ||||