Advertisement
PRPS vs RMIAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a Hold and RMIAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMIAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRPS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMIAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRPS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RMIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
PRPS (@Savings Banks) experienced а -29.17% price change this week, while RMIAF (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.58%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Savings Banks (+2.49% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| PRPS | RMIAF | PRPS / RMIAF | |
| Capitalization | 3.82M | 13.5M | 28% |
| EBITDA | -1.65M | 2.16M | -76% |
| Gain YTD | -59.524 | 38.081 | -156% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.71 | - |
| Revenue | 3.03M | 3.04M | 100% |
| Total Cash | 6.51K | 21.7M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 32.3K | N/A | - |
PRPS | RMIAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRPS's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as RMIAF (21). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.
PRPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMIAF (100). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.
RMIAF's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as PRPS (100). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.
RMIAF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRPS (93). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.
RMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.
| PRPS | RMIAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 31% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
PRPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PRPS and ASHTY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PRPS and ASHTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASHTY - PRPS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| QFIN - PRPS | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.05% | ||
| LU - PRPS | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| MCVT - PRPS | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.81% | ||
| RMIAF - PRPS | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
RMIAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and RM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and RM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMIAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMIAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RM - RMIAF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| WSC - RMIAF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| MCVT - RMIAF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.81% | ||
| PRPS - RMIAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIXGF - RMIAF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||