PRPS
Price
$0.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.65M
RMIAF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.01 (-1.23%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
16.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PRPS vs RMIAF

Header iconPRPS vs RMIAF Comparison
Open Charts PRPS vs RMIAFBanner chart's image
PROPELLUS
Price$0.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
Capitalization7.65M
Automotive Fin
Price$0.80
Change-$0.01 (-1.23%)
Volume$5.49K
Capitalization16.11M
PRPS vs RMIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PRPS vs. RMIAF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRPS is a StrongBuy and RMIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (PRPS: $0.85 vs. RMIAF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: PRPS and RMIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PRPS: 47% vs. RMIAF: 53%
Market capitalization -- PRPS: $7.65M vs. RMIAF: $16.11M
PRPS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $7.65M. RMIAF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $16.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $654.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PRPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMIAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PRPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the long-term than PRPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PRPS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMIAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PRPS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the short-term than PRPS.

Price Growth

PRPS (@Savings Banks) experienced а +6.25% price change this week, while RMIAF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-2.61% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMIAF($16.1M) has a higher market cap than PRPS($7.65M). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 45.694 vs. PRPS (-19.048). RMIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.15M vs. PRPS (-1.65M). RMIAF has more cash in the bank: 22.2M vs. PRPS (6.51K). RMIAF (3.05M) and PRPS (3.03M) have equivalent revenues.
PRPSRMIAFPRPS / RMIAF
Capitalization7.65M16.1M47%
EBITDA-1.65M2.15M-76%
Gain YTD-19.04845.694-42%
P/E RatioN/A10.13-
Revenue3.03M3.05M99%
Total Cash6.51K22.2M0%
Total Debt32.3KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PRPS vs RMIAF: Fundamental Ratings
PRPS
RMIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRPS's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as RMIAF (26). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RMIAF (100). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as PRPS (100). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

PRPS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as RMIAF (41). This means that PRPS’s stock grew similarly to RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRPS (100). This means that RMIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PRPS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PRPSRMIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PRPS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURI5.350.17
+3.28%
CuriosityStream
CRT7.590.23
+3.13%
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
OMCL30.720.22
+0.72%
Omnicell
WING247.44-1.79
-0.72%
Wingstop
PLTR177.57-1.55
-0.87%
Palantir Technologies

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and RM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and RM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
RM - RMIAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
WSC - RMIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
SUIG - RMIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
PRPS - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIXGF - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More