Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRSAX vs TNBMX
PRSAX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts PRSAX vs TNBMX
PRSAX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRSAX vs. TNBMX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSAX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 9.88B vs. PRSAX (2.73B). PRSAX pays higher dividends than TNBMX: PRSAX (4.52) vs TNBMX (3.54). PRSAX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: PRSAX (18 years) vs TNBMX (9 years). PRSAX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). PRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 134.10 vs. TNBMX (74.00). PRSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: PRSAX (2500) vs TNBMX (500000). PRSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. TNBMX (3.23). PRSAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.99 vs. TNBMX (-3.67).
| PRSAX | TNBMX | PRSAX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.53 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.53 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.802 | 1.092 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 9.88B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.52 | 3.54 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 3.23 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.14 | 15.52 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.99 | -3.67 | -109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement