Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRSRX vs RWMFX
PRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PRSRX vs RWMFX
PRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PRSRX (757M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PRSRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs PRSRX (0.39). PRSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PRSRX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PRSRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). PRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: PRSRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). PRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.44 vs. RWMFX (7.03). PRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 39.35 vs. RWMFX (26.38).
| PRSRX | RWMFX | PRSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.31 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.266 | 1.322 | 928% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 757M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.40 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.44 | 7.03 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.22 | 30.20 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.35 | 26.38 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.44 | 82.33 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement