Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRSRX vs RWMFX
PRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PRSRX vs RWMFX
PRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRSRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PRSRX (1.22B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PRSRX: RWMFX (1.41) vs PRSRX (0.39). PRSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PRSRX (24 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PRSRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). PRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: PRSRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). PRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. RWMFX (2.09). PRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. RWMFX (27.39).
| PRSRX | RWMFX | PRSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.31 | 365% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.31 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.543 | 4.508 | 323% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.22B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.41 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.23 | 2.09 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.37 | 30.24 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.11 | 27.39 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.14 | 82.36 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers