Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRWCX vs RPBAX
PRWCX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRWCX vs RPBAX
PRWCX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRWCX vs. RPBAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRWCX is a StrongBuy and RPBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRWCX has more cash in the bank: 71.2B vs. RPBAX (5.33B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than PRWCX: RPBAX (2.05) vs PRWCX (1.69). PRWCX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: PRWCX (40 years) vs RPBAX (86 years). PRWCX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.66). PRWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.70 vs. RPBAX (43.70). PRWCX (2500) and RPBAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.07 vs. PRWCX (8.10). RPBAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.61 vs. PRWCX (11.38).
| PRWCX | RPBAX | PRWCX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.61 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.66 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 86 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.042 | 6.627 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2B | 5.33B | 1,336% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 2.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 12.07 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.37 | 33.55 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 13.61 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.92 | 63.55 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement