Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PRWCX vs RPBAX
PRWCX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts PRWCX vs RPBAX
PRWCX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PRWCX vs. RPBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRWCX is a Hold and RPBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRWCX has more cash in the bank: 69.8B vs. RPBAX (5.29B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than PRWCX: RPBAX (2.05) vs PRWCX (1.69). PRWCX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: PRWCX (40 years) vs RPBAX (87 years). PRWCX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.66). PRWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 124.70 vs. RPBAX (43.70). PRWCX (2500) and RPBAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. PRWCX (5.67). RPBAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.99 vs. PRWCX (8.91).
| PRWCX | RPBAX | PRWCX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.61 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.66 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 87 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.615 | 6.485 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8B | 5.29B | 1,320% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 2.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.67 | 11.97 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.75 | 32.66 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.91 | 12.99 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.24 | 68.25 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement