Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSCZX vs WCMLX
PSCZX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts PSCZX vs WCMLX
PSCZX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSCZX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSCZX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSCZX has more cash in the bank: 3.23B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). PSCZX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: PSCZX (0.28) vs WCMLX (0.00). PSCZX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: PSCZX (31 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than PSCZX (0.82). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. PSCZX (62.00). PSCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: PSCZX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). PSCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.94 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. PSCZX (-10.53).
| PSCZX | WCMLX | PSCZX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.99 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.014 | 3.852 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 47.2M | 6,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 2.81 | 390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.07 | 23.40 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.53 | -7.51 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement