Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.95
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. PSECX (32.1M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.11) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX (9.69) and PSECX (9.37) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.83 vs. PSECX (46.54).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.476 | 9.788 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.11 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.37 | 9.69 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.48 | 25.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.54 | 53.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.43 | 77.07 | 77% |