Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$18.62
Change+$0.10 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.62
Change+$0.26 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.17B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PSECX (31.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.12) vs PSECX (0.40). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.69 vs. PSECX (7.06). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.63 vs. PSECX (47.83).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.890 | 9.183 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.7M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.12 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.06 | 7.69 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.53 | 29.84 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.83 | 55.63 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.97 | 74.05 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement