Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.64M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. PSECX (32.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.05) vs PSECX (0.34). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. PSECX (5.62). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. PSECX (46.59).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.553 | 14.628 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.05 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | 7.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.84 | 43.02 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.59 | 58.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.65 | 92.06 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement