Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$19.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.82M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PSECX (32.8M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.09) vs PSECX (0.39). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. PSECX (6.17). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. PSECX (49.18).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.704 | 12.681 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.8M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.09 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 6.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 33.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.18 | 57.72 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.01 | 94.26 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement