Ad is loading...
PSECX vs RMEBX
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts PSECX vs RMEBX
1789 Growth and Income C
Price$17.04
Change+$0.26 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.51M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
PSECX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PSECX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSECX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. PSECX (29.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than PSECX: RMEBX (1.18) vs PSECX (0.48). PSECX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: PSECX (14 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). PSECX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PSECX (20.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSECX: RMEBX (250) vs PSECX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. PSECX (1.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. PSECX (42.35).
| PSECX | RMEBX | PSECX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.07 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.037 | -2.724 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 1.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.77 | 5.82 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.35 | 52.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.85 | 53.41 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...