PSP
Price
$59.09
Change
+$0.59 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
261.72M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMAT
Price
$29.44
Change
+$0.34 (+1.17%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
238.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PSP vs TMAT

Header iconPSP vs TMAT Comparison
Open Charts PSP vs TMATBanner chart's image
PSP vs TMAT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) vs. Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) provides targeted exposure to publicly listed private equity firms and business development companies (BDCs), while Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) pursues dynamic, multi-theme innovation strategies across emerging technologies and growth areas.
  • PSP maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 63 holdings with a heavy allocation to the financial services sector, whereas TMAT holds around 88-106 securities with significant technology exposure and broader global small- and mid-cap diversification.
  • PSP carries a higher expense ratio of 1.80% due to its specialized index-tracking approach, compared to TMAT’s lower 0.82% expense ratio as an actively managed thematic fund.
  • PSP follows a passive strategy tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index with modified market-cap weighting, while TMAT employs active management focused on thematic rotation among disruptive innovations such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and clean energy.
  • Both ETFs target growth-oriented investors but differ markedly in risk profiles: PSP emphasizes alternative asset managers and private equity vehicles, and TMAT offers exposure to high-volatility innovation themes with potential for sector rotation.
  • Structural differences position PSP as a specialized financials play and TMAT as a flexible thematic innovator, making them complementary rather than direct competitors within broader equity portfolios.

Introduction

Investors seeking differentiated growth exposure often compare specialized equity ETFs like Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT). These funds do not compete directly but instead offer alternative strategies targeting distinct segments of the market. PSP delivers access to listed private equity and related vehicles, while TMAT rotates across multiple innovation themes. Both appeal to investors pursuing long-term capital appreciation amid evolving economic cycles, sector rotations, and technological advancements, allowing for nuanced portfolio construction based on risk tolerance and thematic preferences.

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) Overview

Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index. The index comprises 40 to 75 securities, including American depositary receipts (ADRs) and global depositary receipts (GDRs) of listed private equity companies, business development companies (BDCs), master limited partnerships (MLPs), and alternative asset managers. As of recent data, PSP holds approximately 63 securities. The fund maintains a modified market-cap weighted approach with periodic rebalancing to align with the index. Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in financial services, often exceeding 90% of assets. The expense ratio stands at 1.80%. PSP is listed on NYSE Arca and emphasizes global exposure to vehicles whose primary business involves investing in or providing services to privately held companies.

Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) Overview

Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) is an actively managed ETF that employs dynamic thematic rotation to pursue its investment objective. The fund focuses on identifying emerging, disruptive, and innovative themes with large addressable markets, including artificial intelligence, genomics, fintech, robotics, cybersecurity, clean energy, cloud computing, and autonomous technologies. TMAT typically holds 88 to 106 equity securities with an emphasis on global small- and mid-cap companies. Top sector weightings often feature technology at around 50%, with additional allocations across industrials and other growth areas. The expense ratio is 0.82%. The strategy aims to outperform the MSCI ACWI Index in rising markets while seeking to limit losses during declines through active theme selection and portfolio adjustments.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader environment for both ETFs reflects ongoing interest in alternative investments and technological innovation. Private equity and listed vehicles continue to attract capital seeking exposure to illiquid asset classes through public markets, supported by regulatory frameworks for business development companies (BDCs). Simultaneously, innovation themes benefit from sustained investment in digital transformation, artificial intelligence adoption, and clean energy transitions amid macroeconomic shifts such as interest rate cycles and geopolitical developments. Capital flows into thematic and alternative strategies remain influenced by earnings growth in key sectors and evolving investor demand for diversification beyond traditional large-cap equities. Risks include valuation sensitivity in growth themes and liquidity considerations for specialized vehicles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) has exhibited behavior tied to financial sector dynamics, alternative asset performance, and interest rate expectations, often showing distinct volatility patterns relative to broad equity markets. Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) has demonstrated sensitivity to technology sector rotation, earnings momentum in innovation-driven companies, and shifts in growth sentiment. PSP’s concentrated financials focus tends to produce different drawdown and recovery profiles compared to TMAT’s multi-theme approach, which can benefit from rotation across multiple high-growth areas. Relative positioning highlights PSP’s role in alternative asset exposure versus TMAT’s flexibility in capturing thematic momentum during periods of technological advancement or sector leadership changes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across innovation themes, and active management flexibility in capturing sector momentum. Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) offers compelling specialized exposure but carries higher costs and greater concentration risk within financial services. Final selection should align with individual portfolio objectives and risk parameters.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
PSP vs. TMAT commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PSP is a StrongBuy and TMAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSP has more net assets: 262M vs. TMAT (239M). TMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than PSP: TMAT (17.713) vs PSP (-11.658). PSP was incepted earlier than TMAT: PSP (20 years) vs TMAT (5 years). TMAT (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than PSP (1.80). PSP has a higher turnover TMAT (5.00) vs TMAT (5.00).
PSPTMATPSP / TMAT
Gain YTD-11.65817.713-66%
Net Assets262M239M110%
Total Expense Ratio1.800.82220%
Turnover39.005.00780%
Yield6.340.0237,806%
Fund Existence20 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PSPTMAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PSP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TMAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFPMX41.850.48
+1.16%
Parnassus Mid Cap Institutional
FTYCX55.020.41
+0.75%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq C
NWXUX12.270.09
+0.74%
Nationwide International Sm Cp R6
BIBDX12.820.06
+0.47%
BlackRock Global Dividend Instl
MECAX53.140.21
+0.40%
AMG GW&K International Small Cap N

PSP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSP has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSP jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSP
1D Price
Change %
PSP100%
+1.01%
BX - PSP
77%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
KKR - PSP
75%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
CG - PSP
74%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
TPG - PSP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
OWL - PSP
71%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More

TMAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMAT and ACVA have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMAT and ACVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMAT
1D Price
Change %
TMAT100%
+1.17%
ACVA - TMAT
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.82%
IREN - TMAT
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.40%
WULF - TMAT
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
MU - TMAT
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
CIFR - TMAT
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.26%
More