PT
Price
$0.90
Change
+$0.02 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
17.38M
WU
Price
$8.02
Change
-$0.08 (-0.99%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
4.7B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PT vs WU

Header iconPT vs WU Comparison
Open Charts PT vs WUBanner chart's image
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.90
Change+$0.02 (+2.27%)
Volume$81.03K
Capitalization17.38M
Western Union Company (The)
Price$8.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.99%)
Volume$9.8M
Capitalization4.7B
PT vs WU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PT vs. WU commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PT is a Hold and WU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (PT: $0.88 vs. WU: $8.10)
Brand notoriety: PT and WU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PT: 197% vs. WU: 101%
Market capitalization -- PT: $17.38M vs. WU: $4.7B
PT [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $17.38M. WU’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWU’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the long-term than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WU is a better buy in the short-term than PT.

Price Growth

PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -16.19% price change this week, while WU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -5.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

PT is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

WU is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.93% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WU($4.7B) has a higher market cap than PT($17.4M). PT YTD gains are higher at: -2.255 vs. WU (-19.678). WU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. PT (-57.14M). WU has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. PT (231M). PT has less debt than WU: PT (400M) vs WU (2.67B). WU has higher revenues than PT: WU (4.36B) vs PT (173M).
PTWUPT / WU
Capitalization17.4M4.7B0%
EBITDA-57.14M1.04B-6%
Gain YTD-2.255-19.67811%
P/E RatioN/A8.18-
Revenue173M4.36B4%
Total Cash231M3.22B7%
Total Debt400M2.67B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PT vs WU: Fundamental Ratings
PT
WU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10012
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WU's Valuation (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PT (51) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WU’s stock grew somewhat faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

WU's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.

WU's SMR Rating (12) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WU’s stock grew significantly faster than PT’s over the last 12 months.

PT's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as WU (84) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that PT’s stock grew similarly to WU’s over the last 12 months.

WU's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as PT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that WU’s stock grew similarly to PT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PTWU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGEN6.720.36
+5.66%
Agenus
ALVO8.730.31
+3.68%
Alvotech
BTDR13.750.25
+1.85%
Bitdeer Technologies Group
EIX51.330.39
+0.77%
Edison International
MCVT1.76-0.02
-1.12%
Mill City Ventures III Ltd