Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PTMAX vs RWMFX
PTMAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PTMAX vs RWMFX
PTMAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PTMAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTMAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. PTMAX (1.04B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PTMAX: RWMFX (1.44) vs PTMAX (0.60). PTMAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PTMAX (27 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PTMAX (0.78) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PTMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 123.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTMAX: RWMFX (250) vs PTMAX (1000). PTMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. RWMFX (5.29). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.84 vs. PTMAX (23.10).
| PTMAX | RWMFX | PTMAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.31 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.31 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.238 | 4.709 | 217% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.44 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.44 | 5.29 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.82 | 27.56 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 28.84 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.26 | 78.79 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement