Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PTMCX vs RWMFX
PTMCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts PTMCX vs RWMFX
PTMCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PTMCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PTMCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. PTMCX (1.05B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than PTMCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs PTMCX (0.18). PTMCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: PTMCX (27 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). PTMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). PTMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 123.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PTMCX: RWMFX (250) vs PTMCX (1000). PTMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. RWMFX (7.03). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. PTMCX (17.09).
| PTMCX | RWMFX | PTMCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.31 | 465% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.31 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.155 | 1.322 | 844% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.18 | 1.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | 7.03 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.53 | 30.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.09 | 26.38 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.32 | 82.33 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement