Advertisement
PVARF vs SCWO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PVARF is a Buy and SCWO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PVARF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PVARF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PVARF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PVARF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SCWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PVARF (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCWO (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCWO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Specialties (+0.45% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| PVARF | SCWO | PVARF / SCWO | |
| Capitalization | 464M | 37.8M | 1,228% |
| EBITDA | 30.1M | -14.02M | -215% |
| Gain YTD | 8.696 | -63.375 | -14% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.06 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 196M | 673K | 29,123% |
| Total Cash | 18.8M | 6.88M | 273% |
| Total Debt | 16M | 629K | 2,544% |
PVARF | SCWO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCWO's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as PVARF (98). This means that SCWO’s stock grew similarly to PVARF’s over the last 12 months.
PVARF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (100). This means that PVARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.
PVARF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (98). This means that PVARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.
PVARF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SCWO (63). This means that PVARF’s stock grew similarly to SCWO’s over the last 12 months.
PVARF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCWO (100). This means that PVARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCWO’s over the last 12 months.
| PVARF | SCWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
PVARF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PVARF and EBCOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PVARF and EBCOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PVARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVARF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EBCOF - PVARF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KRDXF - PVARF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RBC - PVARF | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.78% | ||
| QEPC - PVARF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| SCWO - PVARF | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
More | ||||
SCWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCWO has been loosely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCWO jumps, then IR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCWO | 100% | +2.00% | ||
| IR - SCWO | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| DOV - SCWO | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PH - SCWO | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ETN - SCWO | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| ITT - SCWO | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
More | ||||