PWP
Price
$19.80
Change
+$0.33 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jul 18, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
727.72M
13 days until earnings call
QMCI
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
29.86M
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWP vs QMCI

Header iconPWP vs QMCI Comparison
Open Charts PWP vs QMCIBanner chart's image
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$19.80
Change+$0.33 (+1.69%)
Volume$400
Capitalization727.72M
QuoteMedia
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization29.86M
PWP vs QMCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. QMCI commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Hold and QMCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (PWP: $19.47 vs. QMCI: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: PWP and QMCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 82% vs. QMCI: 34%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $727.72M vs. QMCI: $29.86M
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $727.72M. QMCI’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $29.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QMCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PWP and QMCI are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QMCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than QMCI.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -6.17% price change this week, while QMCI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

QMCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.45% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWP($728M) has a higher market cap than QMCI($29.9M). QMCI YTD gains are higher at: 21.827 vs. PWP (-17.794). QMCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.68M vs. PWP (-97.87M). PWP has more cash in the bank: 338M vs. QMCI (675K). QMCI has less debt than PWP: QMCI (454K) vs PWP (176M). PWP has higher revenues than QMCI: PWP (649M) vs QMCI (18M).
PWPQMCIPWP / QMCI
Capitalization728M29.9M2,435%
EBITDA-97.87M2.68M-3,656%
Gain YTD-17.79421.827-82%
P/E RatioN/A95.24-
Revenue649M18M3,606%
Total Cash338M675K50,074%
Total Debt176M454K38,767%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QMCI: Fundamental Ratings
QMCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPQMCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAGCX53.27N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth C
SELCX46.44N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap Growth F (SIMT)
SPVZX25.40N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val Z
WWICX12.08N/A
N/A
Westwood Income Opportunity C
TSGMX16.79N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq R6

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+1.35%
PIPR - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
MC - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
EVR - PWP
83%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
SF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
JEF - PWP
78%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
More

QMCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QMCI and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QMCI and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCI
1D Price
Change %
QMCI100%
N/A
OTCM - QMCI
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
SPXCF - QMCI
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
SPXCY - QMCI
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
PLSQF - QMCI
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWP - QMCI
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More