PWP
Price
$17.63
Change
-$0.97 (-5.22%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
727.72M
71 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$94.50
Change
-$2.72 (-2.80%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.95B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PWP vs SF

Header iconPWP vs SF Comparison
Open Charts PWP vs SFBanner chart's image
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$17.63
Change-$0.97 (-5.22%)
Volume$21.67K
Capitalization727.72M
Stifel Financial
Price$94.50
Change-$2.72 (-2.80%)
Volume$2.01K
Capitalization7.95B
PWP vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. SF commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Buy and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PWP: $17.65 vs. SF: $94.50)
Brand notoriety: PWP and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 82% vs. SF: 63%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $727.72M vs. SF: $7.95B
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $727.72M. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PWP and SF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -8.31% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than PWP($728M). SF YTD gains are higher at: -10.529 vs. PWP (-25.478). PWP has less debt than SF: PWP (176M) vs SF (1.18B). SF has higher revenues than PWP: SF (4.29B) vs PWP (649M).
PWPSFPWP / SF
Capitalization728M7.95B9%
EBITDA-97.87MN/A-
Gain YTD-25.478-10.529242%
P/E RatioN/A18.06-
Revenue649M4.29B15%
Total Cash338MN/A-
Total Debt176M1.18B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF: Fundamental Ratings
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMMF27.79-0.13
-0.47%
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Mltfctr
FOCT42.75-0.49
-1.13%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Oct
VDE114.63-2.15
-1.84%
Vanguard Energy ETF
DFNL40.34-0.84
-2.04%
Davis Select Financial ETF
SZNE34.11-0.73
-2.10%
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Eq WghtSeasnlRottnETF

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-5.11%
EVR - PWP
82%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
MC - PWP
82%
Closely correlated
-5.67%
SF - PWP
77%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
JEF - PWP
76%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
HLI - PWP
76%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-2.80%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
EVR - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-5.26%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-3.96%
MS - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.97%
RJF - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
More