PWP
Price
$25.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
84 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$115.20
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PWP vs SF

Header iconPWP vs SF Comparison
Open Charts PWP vs SFBanner chart's image
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$25.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$875.75K
CapitalizationN/A
Stifel Financial
Price$115.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$369.29K
CapitalizationN/A
PWP vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PWP vs. SF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWP is a Buy and SF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (PWP: $25.05 vs. SF: $115.20)
Brand notoriety: PWP and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PWP: 224% vs. SF: 70%
Market capitalization -- PWP: $727.72M vs. SF: $7.95B
PWP [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $727.72M. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PWP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PWP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PWP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PWP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than PWP.

Price Growth

PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

PWP is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.47% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SF($7.95B) has a higher market cap than PWP($728M). PWP YTD gains are higher at: 107.663 vs. SF (69.199). PWP has less debt than SF: PWP (176M) vs SF (1.18B). SF has higher revenues than PWP: SF (4.29B) vs PWP (649M).
PWPSFPWP / SF
Capitalization728M7.95B9%
EBITDA-97.87MN/A-
Gain YTD107.66369.199156%
P/E RatioN/A18.06-
Revenue649M4.29B15%
Total Cash338MN/A-
Total Debt176M1.18B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SF: Fundamental Ratings
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PWPSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PWP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CABDX7.250.01
+0.14%
AB Relative Value A
GGEAX23.30N/A
N/A
Nationwide Global Sust Eq A
AMOMX25.55-0.08
-0.31%
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style I
SLGYX29.37-0.11
-0.37%
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth A
PASSX66.48-0.46
-0.69%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Adv

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
+0.93%
MC - PWP
70%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
EVR - PWP
69%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
HLI - PWP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
PJT - PWP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
SF - PWP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.00%
PIPR - SF
77%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
GS - SF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
RJF - SF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
EVR - SF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
MS - SF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
More