Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBCX
PWTAX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBCX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.28M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PWTAX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PWTAX (221M). RLBCX (1.46) and PWTAX (1.44) have matching dividends . PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PWTAX (33 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBCX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. PWTAX (1.89). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. PWTAX (2.47).
| PWTAX | RLBCX | PWTAX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.655 | 13.744 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 8.62 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 39.76 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | 36.95 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.97 | 67.89 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement