Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBEX
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBEX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.28M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PWTAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PWTAX (221M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: RLBEX (1.71) vs PWTAX (1.44). PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PWTAX (33 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBEX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.98 vs. PWTAX (1.89). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. PWTAX (2.47).
| PWTAX | RLBEX | PWTAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.59 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.655 | 14.042 | 69% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.71 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 8.98 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 41.02 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | 38.72 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.97 | 73.32 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement