Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PWTAX vs RLBFX
PWTAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PWTAX vs RLBFX
UBS US Allocation A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.28M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PWTAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PWTAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PWTAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PWTAX (221M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PWTAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs PWTAX (1.44). PWTAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PWTAX (33 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). PWTAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PWTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PWTAX: RLBFX (250) vs PWTAX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. PWTAX (1.89). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. PWTAX (2.47).
| PWTAX | RLBFX | PWTAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.29 | 359% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.29 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.655 | 14.331 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 9.32 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 42.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | 40.53 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.97 | 74.39 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement