Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.35
Change+$0.26 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets582.5M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.00
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.45B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. PZFVX (583M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.61) vs RMFEX (1.51). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. PZFVX (-28.77). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. PZFVX (3.15).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.336 | 10.078 | 23% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 583M | 108B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 1.51 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.77 | 10.17 | -283% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.71 | 27.15 | -120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.15 | 57.34 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.41 | 85.69 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement