Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$25.07
Change-$0.36 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets600.89M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.26
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. PZFVX (601M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.48) vs RMFEX (1.49). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.37 vs. PZFVX (-25.94). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.68 vs. PZFVX (16.27).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.029 | 12.781 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 601M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.49 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.94 | 6.37 | -407% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.36 | 41.82 | -46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.27 | 64.68 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.10 | 111.22 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement