Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
JHancock Classic Value A
Price$24.78
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets609.76M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$58.76
Change+$0.14 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.25B
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. PZFVX (610M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (2.63) vs RMFEX (1.58). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). PZFVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PZFVX (29.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. PZFVX (-25.66). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.81 vs. PZFVX (15.86).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.268 | 7.803 | 68% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 107B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 1.58 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -25.66 | 10.28 | -250% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.80 | 29.02 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.86 | 66.81 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.75 | 83.20 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement