Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts PZFVX vs RMFEX
PZFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PZFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PZFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. PZFVX (513M). PZFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: PZFVX (1.80) vs RMFEX (1.45). PZFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: PZFVX (30 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). PZFVX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. PZFVX (13.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PZFVX: RMFEX (250) vs PZFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. PZFVX (-12.73). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. PZFVX (-45.70).
| PZFVX | RMFEX | PZFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.62 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.005 | 5.987 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.45 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.73 | 10.46 | -122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.51 | 35.96 | -93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.70 | 35.97 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.09 | 99.50 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement