Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.38M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.73
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QABGX (297M). QABGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QABGX (1.20) vs RLBAX (1.10). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) and RLBAX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. QABGX (3.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. QABGX (23.20).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 14.271 | 81% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.10 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | 9.08 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.70 | 48.64 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 38.13 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.50 | 69.46 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement