Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$21.60
Change+$0.09 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.84M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. QABGX (245M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBAX (1.59) vs QABGX (1.32). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QABGX (104.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.41 vs. QABGX (9.14). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.82 vs. QABGX (18.09).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.791 | 1.911 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 240B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 11.41 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.08 | 10.53 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.09 | 25.82 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.04 | 49.89 | 90% |