Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$21.81
Change-$0.25 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.17M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.95
Change-$0.35 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.17B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 242B vs. QABGX (252M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBAX (1.59) vs QABGX (1.32). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QABGX (104.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. QABGX (6.08). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.04 vs. QABGX (19.24).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.780 | 2.764 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 242B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.59 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 8.36 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.72 | 15.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.24 | 26.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.83 | 46.53 | 88% |