Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.94M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.68
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.12B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. QABGX (283M). QABGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QABGX (1.23) vs RLBAX (1.17). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) and RLBAX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. QABGX (7.86). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.40 vs. QABGX (21.22).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 8.123 | 108% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 253B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.17 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 9.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.23 | 28.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 32.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.24 | 57.80 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement