Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$21.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.21M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. QABGX (260M). QABGX (1.33) and RLBAX (1.28) have matching dividends . QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) and RLBAX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. QABGX (0.43). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. QABGX (27.11).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.895 | 0.096 | 937% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.43 | 3.43 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | 19.38 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.11 | 32.37 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.90 | 44.68 | 87% |