Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.55
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets272.39M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.64B
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. QABGX (272M). QABGX (1.28) and RLBAX (1.23) have matching dividends . QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) and RLBAX (1.31) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.54 vs. QABGX (2.93). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.27 vs. QABGX (26.79).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.31 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.31 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.514 | 6.354 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 248B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.23 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 6.54 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.60 | 30.13 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.79 | 38.27 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.27 | 56.75 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement