Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBAX
QABGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QABGX (323M). RLBAX (1.14) and QABGX (1.13) have matching dividends . QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QABGX (21 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) and RLBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.43 vs. QABGX (5.34). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.29 vs. QABGX (7.03).
| QABGX | RLBAX | QABGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.32 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.32 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.007 | 7.547 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.14 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 14.43 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.09 | 39.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | 28.29 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.31 | 73.85 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement