Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$22.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.64M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QABGX (278M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.10) vs QABGX (1.25). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. QABGX (1.77). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.37 vs. QABGX (22.75).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.29 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.975 | 8.017 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 2.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 5.97 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 36.30 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.75 | 40.37 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.92 | 64.89 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement