Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.38M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.17
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QABGX (297M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.00) vs QABGX (1.20). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. QABGX (3.33). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. QABGX (23.20).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.29 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 15.154 | 76% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.00 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | 10.26 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.70 | 53.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 44.28 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.50 | 80.75 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement