Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.21M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QABGX (297M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (1.97) vs QABGX (1.19). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. QABGX (0.09). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. QABGX (18.03).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.29 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.320 | 14.331 | 72% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.97 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.09 | 9.32 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.05 | 42.18 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.03 | 40.53 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.52 | 74.39 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement