Ad is loading...
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$20.30
Change+$0.20 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.83M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.17
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.04B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 226B vs. QABGX (245M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.26) vs QABGX (1.33). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QABGX (68.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.19 vs. QABGX (-3.67). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. QABGX (25.45).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.30 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.30 | 457% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.336 | -3.179 | 136% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 245M | 226B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 2.26 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.67 | 1.19 | -309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.47 | 11.14 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.45 | 37.06 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.85 | 48.21 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...