Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced A
Price$23.09
Change+$0.11 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.94M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.13
Change+$0.10 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.12B
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. QABGX (283M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.08) vs QABGX (1.23). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QABGX (1.37) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. QABGX (7.86). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.36 vs. QABGX (21.22).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.29 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.29 | 472% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.812 | 8.779 | 100% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 253B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.08 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.86 | 11.12 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.23 | 32.24 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.22 | 38.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.24 | 67.86 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement