Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QABGX vs RLBFX
QABGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QABGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QABGX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QABGX (323M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: RLBFX (2.02) vs QABGX (1.13). QABGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QABGX (21 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: RLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.71 vs. QABGX (5.34). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.12 vs. QABGX (7.03).
| QABGX | RLBFX | QABGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.30 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.30 | 450% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.007 | 8.053 | 50% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 2.02 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 15.71 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.09 | 44.26 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.03 | 34.12 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.31 | 86.38 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement