Advertisement
QBTS vs RGTI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) vs. Rigetti Computing (RGTI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both QBTS and RGTI are pure-play quantum computing companies that have posted sharp year-to-date declines amid a broader repricing of speculative growth stocks.
- D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) operates a dual-platform strategy spanning annealing and gate-model systems, while Rigetti Computing (RGTI) focuses on superconducting gate-based quantum processors.
- Each company secured up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding, giving both a government-backed catalyst while introducing minority equity dilution.
- Relative performance has favored RGTI modestly over recent weeks, though both names remain highly volatile with betas well above the broader market.
- Revenue remains small and lumpy for both firms, with losses still far exceeding sales, keeping execution risk elevated across the sector.
- Neither company currently generates profit, so valuation is driven primarily by growth expectations rather than earnings.
- For more detail on each ticker, explore QBTS Major News and QBTS Today's Price Move, as well as RGTI Major News and RGTI Today's Price Move.
- To see how automated systems are positioning across this market, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Quantum computing has emerged as one of the most closely watched speculative technology themes in recent years, and D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI) sit at the center of that conversation. Both are early-stage, cash-burning hardware developers competing for government funding, research contracts, and early commercial deployments. This stock comparison is most relevant to growth-oriented traders and investors comfortable with elevated volatility who want to understand how two prominent quantum names differ in technology, financial position, and market positioning. While both stocks have benefited from the same sector-wide catalysts, their business models and recent trajectories diverge in meaningful ways that can shape relative performance and risk.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) develops and delivers quantum computing systems, software, and services. The company is notable for operating both annealing systems—its historical specialty—and gate-model quantum computers, a dual-platform approach strengthened by its acquisition of Quantum Circuits Inc. Its customer base spans logistics, manufacturing, and defense, with deployments tied to organizations such as BASF, Davidson Technologies, and North Wales Police.
In recent weeks, QBTS has come under sustained selling pressure, falling roughly 30% over the past month and more than 50% year to date. The decline has been driven less by company-specific failures than by sector-wide sentiment shifts, including a large stock sale by peer IonQ that raised concerns about dilution across the industry. A securities class action lawsuit—whose allegations remain unproven—added a legal overhang. At the same time, the company finalized up to $100 million in CHIPS Act funding, delivered an Advantage2 system to Como, Italy, and extended its manufacturing agreement with SkyWater, underscoring that operational progress has continued even as the share price weakened.
RGTI Overview and Recent Performance
Rigetti Computing (RGTI) builds and operates superconducting quantum processors and the systems built around them. Its approach centers on gate-based, modular chiplet architecture, exemplified by systems such as the Novera QPU (quantum processing unit) and the Cepheus-1-108Q platform. Revenue is generated through system sales, cloud access, and government and research contracts, with notable relationships including the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and India's C-DAC.
RGTI has also faced significant pressure, down roughly 20% over the past month and close to 47% year to date, though its recent decline has been somewhat milder than that of D-Wave. Like its peer, Rigetti finalized a definitive agreement for up to $100 million in CHIPS and Science Act funding, which initially boosted shares but has not reversed the broader pullback. The company ended its latest quarter with more than $500 million in cash and no debt, a balance-sheet cushion that provides runway. However, revenue remains highly dependent on the timing of system deliveries, keeping quarterly results uneven and sentiment sensitive to delivery schedules.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but not all of them fit every market environment. The Trending AI Robots page is a curated selection highlighting the bots best suited to current conditions. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, and the sets of tickers they trade, allowing users to review a range of approaches rather than a single one-size-fits-all system. The page showcases bots that have demonstrated strong recent results, giving traders a focused way to see which automated strategies are adapting to the market. To explore the current lineup and see which strategies are gaining traction, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most significant contrast between these two companies lies in their technological focus. QBTS offers a dual-platform model spanning annealing and gate-model systems, giving it broader exposure across quantum computing approaches. RGTI, by contrast, is concentrated on superconducting gate-based processors with a modular chiplet design, positioning it squarely in the race toward larger, fault-tolerant systems.
Financially, both companies remain deeply unprofitable, but their cash positions differ in scale. D-Wave reported roughly $546 million in cash at mid-year against expectations of substantial ongoing cash burn, while Rigetti ended its latest quarter with over $500 million in cash and no debt. Both secured comparable CHIPS Act awards, meaning neither enjoys a clear funding advantage, though each accepted minority government equity stakes in return.
On momentum and sentiment, RGTI has held up somewhat better than QBTS over recent weeks, in part because D-Wave has faced the added weight of a securities lawsuit. Both carry beta well above 2, indicating sharp amplification of broader market moves. Sector exposure is essentially identical, leaving the comparison focused on technology breadth, balance-sheet durability, and near-term catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean modestly toward RGTI in the current environment. Rigetti's comparatively smaller recent drawdown, debt-free balance sheet, and absence of the legal overhang currently facing D-Wave contribute to a slightly more stable relative profile. That said, both names remain high-risk, high-volatility instruments, and any edge is narrow and probabilistic rather than definitive. The outcome could shift quickly with earnings reports, delivery updates, or renewed sector-wide selling pressure, underscoring why a data-driven, continuously updated approach matters in this space.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Buy and RGTI is a Hold.
QBTS's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for QBTS moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 27 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 56 of 61 cases where QBTS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QBTS just turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where QBTS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
Following a +26.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QBTS advanced for three days, in 167 of 198 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
The Aroon Indicator for QBTS entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.743) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.197). P/E Ratio (-15.257) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.670). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. QBTS's P/S Ratio (476.190) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
RGTI's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for RGTI moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 28 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RGTI just turned positive on November 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where RGTI's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
Following a +31.78% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RGTI advanced for three days, in 217 of 253 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
RGTI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on RGTI as a result. In 72 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RGTI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Aroon Indicator for RGTI entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. RGTI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 84 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.297) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.197). P/E Ratio (-15.260) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.670). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. RGTI's P/S Ratio (370.370) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (51.774).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RGTI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
| QBTS | RGTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RGTI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RGTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGTI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- RGTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +9.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -20.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2027.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-1.32% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
Advertisement
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -8.63% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 93% Closely correlated | -6.39% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 85% Closely correlated | -8.16% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| UMAC - QBTS | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.60% | ||
| SSYS - QBTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||
RGTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGTI has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGTI jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGTI | 100% | -6.39% | ||
| QBTS - RGTI | 94% Closely correlated | -8.63% | ||
| QUBT - RGTI | 88% Closely correlated | -8.16% | ||
| IONQ - RGTI | 86% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| UMAC - RGTI | 64% Loosely correlated | -6.60% | ||
| SSYS - RGTI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGHG | 77.25 | 0.10 | +0.13% |
| ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) | |||
| ATTR | 96.21 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | |||
| SFLR | 38.57 | -0.16 | -0.41% |
| Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) | |||
| HOMZ | 43.80 | -0.83 | -1.86% |
| Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) | |||
| ARCX | 8.07 | -0.36 | -4.27% |
| Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) | |||