Quantum computing has emerged as one of the most closely watched speculative themes in technology, and two of its most prominent pure-play names are D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) and Rigetti Computing (RGTI). Both companies recently secured major U.S. government backing, and both have experienced sharp swings in share price as investor sentiment around quantum commercialization has shifted. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent momentum, risk profiles, and relative performance to help traders and investors assess how these two names compare in the current market environment. It is particularly relevant for those weighing exposure to an emerging, high-volatility sector where technical milestones and funding headlines can drive outsized moves.
D-Wave Quantum is a dual-platform quantum computing company best known for its commercialized quantum annealing systems, which target optimization problems, while also building gate-model machines. The company has positioned itself as having one of the more established near-term commercialization paths in the sector, citing more than 100 revenue-generating customers across industries such as telecom and logistics.
In recent weeks, QBTS finalized a definitive agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce for access to up to $100 million in funding under the CHIPS and Science Act, supporting development of its annealing and gate-model systems. The company also expanded commercial deployments with partners including NTT DOCOMO and AT&T. First-half bookings surged 1,120% year over year, though quarterly revenue remained modest at roughly $3.1 million. Sentiment has been mixed: the stock has declined significantly from its 52-week high and trades down over the past three months, even as it has participated in recent sector-wide rallies. A relatively high cash burn rate of around $37 million per quarter and a valuation above 90 times forward sales remain key considerations for investors.
Rigetti Computing designs and operates superconducting quantum computers and the quantum processors that power them, advancing a chiplet-based roadmap toward systems of up to 1,000 qubits. Its focus is on gate-model quantum hardware, with recent progress on its 108-qubit Cepheus-1 platform.
Like D-Wave, RGTI finalized an agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce for up to $100 million in CHIPS Act funding, with the government receiving a minority, non-controlling equity stake. The company also expanded a collaboration with Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center involving a nine-qubit Novera system supported by a National Science Foundation grant. Revenue in the most recent quarter rose 185% year over year to about $5.1 million, driven partly by on-premises processor sales, and gross margin expanded to 43%. Rigetti maintains a strong balance sheet with roughly $541 million in cash and no debt, though operating expenses remain elevated relative to its small revenue base, and the stock has also declined over the trailing three months while participating in recent quantum rallies.
For traders who prefer a systematic approach to navigating volatile sectors, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-driven trading strategies. Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a focused subset earns a place in the Trending section based on their suitability for current market conditions. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance, win rate, profit factor, and the tickers they trade, with featured strategies spanning short-interval and multi-day approaches across sectors such as technology, energy, and financials. Displayed metrics include annualized return, win rate, profit factor, and profit-to-drawdown ratio, giving traders a quantitative view of each bot's historical behavior. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are currently aligned with the market.
The two companies pursue different paths within quantum computing. QBTS differentiates itself through commercialized annealing technology already generating practical use cases, supplemented by a newer gate-model program and an acquisition of Quantum Circuits. RGTI, by contrast, is focused squarely on superconducting gate-model processors and a modular, chiplet-based hardware roadmap.
On growth, Rigetti has shown faster recent revenue expansion, while D-Wave has demonstrated stronger order-book momentum. Both carry substantial cash cushions after their respective government awards, but D-Wave's higher cash burn rate stands out as a comparative risk. Valuation also differs: D-Wave trades at a higher forward price-to-sales multiple relative to its revenue base, while Rigetti screens expensive on price-to-book versus the broader semiconductor group. In terms of analyst sentiment, QBTS enjoys a stronger consensus rating and larger implied upside, while RGTI holds a more moderate "Buy" rating. Both stocks remain highly correlated to sector news flow, meaning peer catalysts can drive outsized sympathy moves in either direction.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward QBTS at the present juncture. D-Wave currently shows stronger commercial bookings momentum, a more established near-term revenue path through annealing, a higher consensus rating, and larger average implied upside from analysts. Its higher cash burn and loftier valuation, however, introduce meaningful downside risk. RGTI offers a cleaner balance sheet and faster recent growth, but its earlier-stage commercial profile and more moderate consensus support suggest slightly less conviction in near-term positioning. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive and reflects current data rather than a fixed forecast.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| QBTS | RGTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while RGTI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGTI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +5.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.84%.
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XDQQ | 41.70 | 0.25 | +0.61% |
| Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) | |||
| VONV | 110.51 | 0.54 | +0.49% |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) | |||
| ESLV | 28.14 | 0.08 | +0.28% |
| Eventide Large Cap Value ETF (ESLV) | |||
| PBTP | 25.47 | 0.05 | +0.18% |
| Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) | |||
| AVRE | 44.90 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Avantis Real Estate ETF (AVRE) | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 85% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 83% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| UMAC - QBTS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| DPRO - QBTS | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.95% | ||
More | ||||