Quantum computing stocks like QBTS and RGTI have captured investor attention amid advancing technology and sector hype. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance, and market positioning in the current environment. Traders seeking high-growth tech exposure and investors eyeing long-term disruptive potential in optimization, AI, and simulation applications will find value in understanding their relative strengths, risks, and momentum. Both companies reported Q4 results recently, highlighting contrasts in revenue trends and analyst sentiment, aiding informed stock comparison decisions.
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS), founded in 1999 and based in Palo Alto, California, specializes in quantum annealing systems, software, and cloud services for solving complex optimization problems. Its offerings include the Advantage2 quantum computer, Leap cloud platform, and Ocean developer tools, serving logistics, drug discovery, and portfolio optimization needs.
In recent market activity, QBTS shares have traded around $18.59, reflecting consolidation after strong yearly gains of over 255%. Q4 revenue rose 19% year-over-year to $2.75 million despite missing estimates, with full-year growth at 179% and a robust cash position of $836 million supporting dual annealing-gate model development. Sentiment has been influenced by acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc., major deals such as Florida Atlantic University's $20M Advantage2 purchase, and analyst targets averaging $37.61, though YTD declines of 29% stem from post-earnings pullbacks and sector rotation.
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI), established in 2013 in Berkeley, California, develops superconducting quantum processors and full-stack systems, offering QPUs like Novera 9-qubit, Ankaa-3 84-qubit, and QCaaS cloud access. It targets government, enterprise, and research clients with hardware, software, and professional services for scalable quantum applications.
Recent weeks have seen RGTI shares hover near $17.01, down 23% YTD but up 100% over one year, amid high volatility. Q4 revenue of $1.9 million missed estimates and declined year-over-year, prompting a 9% drop despite EPS meeting expectations and technical advances like 99% two-qubit gate fidelity. Key wins include an $8.4M Indian government order and $5.7M Novera sales, bolstering a $590M cash position. Analyst targets average $33.21, with focus shifting to roadmap progress toward 1,000+ qubits by 2027, though revenue concerns have tempered recent sentiment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of over 25 high-performing AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes from 5 minutes to daily, and ML models for technical/fundamental analysis, with standout performances including annualized returns up to +218%, win rates of 52-95%, and profit factors reaching 25.83. Examples include AeroDefense ITA at +32% annualized with 80% win rate and multi-ticker bots yielding +135% in sectors like semiconductors and energy. Selected for current market conditions like volatility and sector rotations, they offer copy trading options for real-time signals and virtual portfolios. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify suitable automated strategies.
QBTS and RGTI share quantum sector exposure but diverge in models: annealing for practical optimization at QBTS versus gate-model universality at RGTI. Growth drivers include QBTS's commercial revenue surge and bookings versus RGTI's fidelity improvements and contracts. Recent momentum favors QBTS with superior YTD recovery potential post-earnings, while RGTI faces revenue headwinds. Risks encompass high burns, dilution, and tech hurdles for both, amplified by RGTI's beta of 2.11. Market sentiment leans positive on QBTS's cash runway amid relative performance dips in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors QBTS based on trend consistency in revenue growth, fortified balance sheet, and higher analyst-implied upside relative to recent positioning. Observable catalysts like system deployments and ecosystem expansions provide nearer-term stability compared to RGTI's fidelity-focused roadmap, suggesting probabilistically stronger momentum in prevailing conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGTI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGTI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.78%.
QBTS is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on May 18, 2026.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| QBTS | RGTI | QBTS / RGTI | |
| Capitalization | 5.13B | 4.75B | 108% |
| EBITDA | -348.74M | -208.04M | 168% |
| Gain YTD | -46.960 | -35.395 | 133% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 24.6M | 7.09M | 347% |
| Total Cash | 884M | 444M | 199% |
| Total Debt | 43.5M | 7.17M | 607% |
| QBTS | RGTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 78% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -4.80% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGTI has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGTI jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGTI | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| QBTS - RGTI | 78% Closely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| IONQ - RGTI | 74% Closely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| QUBT - RGTI | 74% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| QMCO - RGTI | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| CAN - RGTI | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||