Advertisement
QBTS vs RGTI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) vs. Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both QBTS and RGTI operate in the quantum computing sector, with QBTS focusing on annealing systems for optimization and RGTI on gate-model universal computing.
- QBTS trades at around $22.57 with a market cap of $8.36B, showing YTD gains of 13.69% and 1-year returns of 116.60%, driven by recent acquisitions and strong bookings.
- RGTI is at $18.94 with a $6.30B market cap, posting YTD returns of 14.49% and 1-year gains of 83.71%, boosted by its 108-qubit system launch.
- Recent momentum favors both amid sector hype, but QBTS exhibits higher volatility with superior longer-term returns, while RGTI advances in qubit scalability.
- Upcoming Q1 earnings for both could shift sentiment, with QBTS highlighting commercial traction and RGTI focusing on hardware milestones.
- Investor interest in quantum stocks remains strong, reflected in relative outperformance versus broader indices like the S&P 500.
Introduction
In the rapidly evolving quantum computing landscape, QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc.) and RGTI (Rigetti Computing, Inc.) stand out as pure-play public companies pioneering next-generation hardware and services. This stock comparison examines their business models, recent market performance, and growth catalysts, offering insights for traders eyeing high-volatility tech opportunities and long-term investors betting on quantum's transformative potential. Both have delivered triple-digit 1-year returns amid sector enthusiasm, but differing approaches—annealing versus gate-model—create distinct risk-reward profiles in today's market environment focused on AI and advanced computing.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) specializes in annealing quantum computers optimized for solving complex optimization problems in logistics, drug discovery, and portfolio management. The company offers cloud-based access via its Leap service (quantum computing as a service, or QCaaS) and hybrid solvers combining quantum and classical resources. Recent market activity has seen QBTS shares consolidate around $22.57, with a market cap of $8.36 billion. Year-to-date returns stand at 13.69%, outpacing the S&P 500's 8.08%, while 1-year gains reach 116.60%.
Sentiment has been influenced by strategic moves, including the acquisition of Quantum Circuits Inc. to bolster gate-model capabilities alongside its annealing systems, and major bookings like a $20 million system sale to Florida Atlantic University and a $10 million QCaaS deal with a Fortune 100 firm. Fiscal 2025 revenue surged 179% to $24.6 million, with gross margins hitting 82.6% in Q4, though losses persist due to R&D investments. Analyst endorsements, such as Jim Cramer's pick, and upcoming Q1 earnings on May 12 have supported recent consolidation after earlier volatility.
RGTI Overview and Recent Performance
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) develops full-stack superconducting quantum processors and systems, emphasizing gate-model quantum computers for universal applications. Its offerings include QPUs like the 84-qubit Ankaa-3 and cloud access through Rigetti Quantum Cloud Services, serving enterprises, governments, and researchers. Shares recently traded at $18.94, with a $6.30 billion market cap. YTD performance shows 14.49% gains, surpassing the S&P 500, and 1-year returns of 83.71%.
Recent weeks have featured momentum from the launch of its 108-qubit Cepheus-1-108Q modular system, available via AWS Braket, and an $8.4 million order from India's C-DAC. These hardware advancements and international validation have driven gains amid sector volatility, though Q4 2025 revenue dipped 18% year-over-year to $1.9 million due to lumpy bookings. Ongoing R&D for higher fidelity gates and Q1 earnings anticipation on May 11 underpin sentiment, balancing technical progress against persistent operating losses.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse sectors. These bots are selected by AI analysis as the most promising for current market conditions, featuring strategies like trend-following, momentum rotation, and risk-managed swing trades (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors) on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 23% to 285%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 7.12, with standouts like the Space Infrastructure bot at +285% annualized (72% win rate) and Semiconductor Manufacturing at +96% (64% win rate). Traders can explore these virtual agents for copy trading in high-growth areas like semis, energy, and AI infrastructure. Visit Trending AI Robots to review real-time stats and deploy bots suited to volatile markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
QBTS and RGTI share quantum sector exposure but diverge in models: D-Wave's annealing targets immediate optimization use cases with proven commercial revenue, while Rigetti's gate-model aims for broader universality, prioritizing qubit scale over near-term sales. Growth drivers for QBTS include enterprise QCaaS adoption and hybrid expansions; RGTI leverages modular hardware like 108-qubit systems and global orders.
Recent momentum shows both rebounding in recent weeks—QBTS up ~48% monthly, RGTI ~25%—fueled by catalysts, though both trail 52-week highs amid YTD volatility. Risk factors are similar: high cash burn, dilution potential, and tech hurdles, with QBTS' larger cap ($8.36B vs. $6.30B) suggesting relative stability but higher execution demands. Market sentiment favors QBTS for traction, RGTI for innovation, trading near-term revenue for long-term scalability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward QBTS based on stronger trend consistency from commercial bookings, revenue growth (179% in FY2025), and dual-platform positioning via recent acquisitions, offering more observable catalysts amid quantum hype. RGTI trails slightly due to revenue dips but holds upside from hardware scalability. Probabilistic edge to QBTS for relative stability and momentum in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Hold and RGTI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGTI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGTI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RGTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+2.13% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| QBTS | RGTI | QBTS / RGTI | |
| Capitalization | 8.66B | 6.97B | 124% |
| EBITDA | -386.5M | -211.57M | 183% |
| Gain YTD | -10.631 | -5.282 | 201% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 12.4M | 10M | 124% |
| Total Cash | 588M | 418M | 141% |
| Total Debt | 46.8M | 6.78M | 690% |
| QBTS | RGTI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with IONQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then IONQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 52% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||
RGTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGTI has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGTI jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGTI | 100% | +1.70% | ||
| QBTS - RGTI | 88% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| IONQ - RGTI | 82% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| QUBT - RGTI | 79% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| QMCO - RGTI | 53% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
| CAN - RGTI | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||