Advertisement
QBTS vs QUBT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) vs. Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) boasts a larger market cap of approximately $8.36 billion and higher trailing twelve-month revenue of $24.6 million, driven by commercial annealing quantum systems and recent strong bookings exceeding prior-year totals in early 2026.
- Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) holds a $2.17 billion market cap with minimal revenue (under $1 million annually), focusing on photonic quantum machines and recent product launches like NeuraWave for edge AI.
- QBTS shows superior recent momentum with a 116.60% one-year return and 13.69% YTD, outpacing QUBT's 13.74% one-year and 6.43% YTD gains, amid quantum sector volatility.
- Both stocks exhibit high volatility typical of emerging quantum computing plays, with QBTS benefiting from acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc. and customer wins, while QUBT advances through photonic platform deployments.
- Recent market activity highlights QBTS's edge in trend consistency and commercial traction, positioning it favorably in head-to-head relative performance analysis.
Introduction
Quantum computing stocks like D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) represent high-growth opportunities in a nascent sector poised to disrupt optimization, AI, and simulation challenges beyond classical computing limits. This comparison evaluates their business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning amid rising investor interest in quantum technologies. Traders seeking momentum in volatile tech plays and long-term investors eyeing enterprise adoption will find insights into relative performance, sentiment shifts, and key catalysts driving these stocks in the current environment.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) pioneers commercial annealing quantum computing systems, offering cloud access via Leap, hybrid solvers, and on-premises QPUs (quantum processing units) for optimization problems in logistics, drug discovery, and manufacturing. With over 25 years in the field, D-Wave holds a first-mover advantage, recently launching Advantage2 with enhanced coherence and connectivity.
In recent market activity, QBTS shares have surged, reflecting a 116.60% one-year return and trading around $22.57 with an $8.36 billion market cap. Momentum stems from robust bookings—January 2026 alone topped all of 2025—fueled by a $20 million system sale to Florida Atlantic University and a $10 million QCaaS (quantum computing as a service) contract with a Fortune 100 firm. Acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc. bolster gate-model capabilities, while endorsements from figures like Jim Cramer have lifted sentiment. Despite lumpy revenue ($24.6 million TTM) and ongoing losses, these developments signal scaling commercial traction.
QUBT Overview and Recent Performance
Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) specializes in integrated photonics for quantum machines, developing thin-film lithium niobate chips, entropy quantum computers (EQC), reservoir computing via Emucore and NeuraWave, and applications in LiDAR, vibrometry, and quantum networks for edge AI and cybersecurity.
Recent weeks have seen QUBT shares fluctuate around $9.60, with a $2.17 billion market cap, 13.74% one-year return, and 6.43% YTD gain. Performance reflects product advancements, including deployment-ready NeuraWave for real-time AI inference and acquisitions like NuCrypt and Luminar Semiconductor to scale manufacturing. Q4 2025 revenue hit $198,000 (up 219% YoY), with Q1 2026 earnings anticipated amid raised estimates. Insider sales and low institutional ownership temper enthusiasm, yet photonic focus positions QUBT for niche growth in accessible quantum solutions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only 25 bots secure a spot in this trending section, chosen by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions, volatility, and opportunities in sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and industrials. These bots showcase diverse trading styles—from short-term scalping on 5-minute to 60-minute charts using TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%) to trend-following and multi-agent strategies incorporating technical and fundamental analysis (FA). Performance stats vary widely, with annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 19.14, catering to low-, medium-, and high-risk profiles. Explore Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots to identify automated strategies aligning with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) operate in quantum computing but diverge in approach: QBTS emphasizes scalable annealing for enterprise optimization via cloud and systems sales, while QUBT targets photonics for compact, reprogrammable machines in AI and sensing.
Growth drivers contrast sharply—QBTS leverages proven bookings and dual-platform expansion (annealing plus gate-model post-acquisition), versus QUBT's manufacturing push via foundry builds and NeuraWave. Recent momentum favors QBTS with explosive returns and higher revenue scale, though both face sector risks like technological hurdles and cash burn.
Risk profiles differ: QBTS (beta 1.95) shows lumpier but larger deals, exposing it to execution variability; QUBT (beta 3.70) amplifies volatility via minimal revenue and insider activity. Market sentiment tilts toward QBTS's commercial validation, trading at a premium P/S multiple reflective of its relative positioning in the quantum race.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) over Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT), based on superior trend consistency, established revenue trajectory ($24.6 million TTM), and catalysts like surging bookings and platform diversification. While QUBT offers photonic upside, QBTS's commercial momentum and market cap leadership suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance in the quantum sector.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTS is a Hold and QUBT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QUBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +10.15% price change this week, while QUBT (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +4.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +5.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.
QUBT is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+5.81% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| QBTS | QUBT | QBTS / QUBT | |
| Capitalization | 8.36B | 2.17B | 386% |
| EBITDA | -348.74M | -13.67M | 2,552% |
| Gain YTD | -13.690 | -6.433 | 213% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 24.6M | 682K | 3,607% |
| Total Cash | 884M | 1.12B | 79% |
| Total Debt | 43.5M | 1.81M | 2,406% |
QUBT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QBTS | QUBT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| COFRX | 42.50 | 0.34 | +0.81% |
| Columbia Contrarian Core Inst2 | |||
| BRUHX | 17.56 | 0.11 | +0.63% |
| MFS Blended Research Value Equity I | |||
| COSNX | 13.60 | 0.07 | +0.52% |
| Columbia Overseas Core Institutional | |||
| QISRX | 14.85 | 0.03 | +0.20% |
| Pear Tree Polaris Intl Opps R6 | |||
| PMEGX | 52.35 | -0.31 | -0.59% |
| T. Rowe Price Instl Mid-Cap Equity Gr | |||
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | +2.64% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 78% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
QUBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| RGTI - QUBT | 75% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| QBTS - QUBT | 72% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| IONQ - QUBT | 69% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| QMCO - QUBT | 53% Loosely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| CAN - QUBT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||