IONQ
Price
$55.87
Change
-$1.02 (-1.79%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
20.85B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QBTS
Price
$20.94
Change
-$1.41 (-6.31%)
Updated
May 13, 11:07 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.28B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IONQ vs QBTS

Header iconIONQ vs QBTS Comparison
Open Charts IONQ vs QBTSBanner chart's image
IONQ vs QBTS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) vs. D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • IONQ reported $130 million in 2025 revenue, up 202% year-over-year, with Q1 2026 revenue surging 755% to $64.7 million and a raised full-year outlook of $260–$270 million.
  • QBTS achieved $24.6 million in 2025 revenue, a 179% increase, supported by strong early 2026 bookings exceeding $32.8 million, though bookings dipped 22% for the full year.
  • Both stocks exhibit high volatility in recent market activity, with IONQ gaining over 50% in the past month amid acquisitions like Oxford Ionics, while QBTS shows robust defense partnerships but smaller scale.
  • IONQ's remaining performance obligations (RPO, a measure of contracted future revenue) reached $470 million, up 554%, signaling stronger visibility than QBTS's trajectory.
  • Quantum sector sentiment favors gate-model scalability of IONQ over QBTS's annealing focus, though both benefit from commercial and government demand.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines IONQ and QBTS, two leaders in quantum computing, amid rising investor interest in the sector's potential to revolutionize fields like optimization, simulation, and AI. Both companies have posted explosive revenue growth in recent years, driven by commercial contracts, government partnerships, and technological milestones. Traders seeking high-momentum plays in emerging tech and long-term investors eyeing scalable quantum platforms will find value in analyzing their relative performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of volatility and sector tailwinds.

IONQ Overview and Recent Performance

IONQ, Inc., a pioneer in trapped-ion quantum computing, develops general-purpose systems accessible via cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. Its hardware emphasizes high-fidelity qubits and all-to-all connectivity, targeting broad applications in drug discovery, materials science, and cybersecurity. In recent market activity, IONQ shares have shown strong upward momentum, rising over 50% in the past month, supported by a record Q1 2026 revenue of $64.7 million—a 755% year-over-year increase—and full-year 2025 revenue of $130 million, up 202%. Sentiment has been bolstered by strategic moves, including the acquisition of Oxford Ionics for $1.08 billion to advance qubit scaling and a pending merger with SkyWater Technology for manufacturing enhancements. Remaining performance obligations hit $470 million, up 554%, reflecting robust backlog from commercial (60%) and international (35%) sources. Despite high cash burn typical of scaling quantum infrastructure, IONQ's $3.3 billion cash position provides runway, though volatility persists with a beta over 3.

QBTS Overview and Recent Performance

D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) specializes in quantum annealing systems for optimization problems, complemented by gate-model advancements via its Quantum Circuits acquisition, positioning it as a dual-platform provider. Its Leap cloud service and Ocean tools enable hybrid quantum-classical solving for logistics, finance, and defense. Recent weeks have seen QBTS stock volatility with gains around 48% monthly, fueled by partnerships like Davidson Technologies and Anduril for missile defense applications. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $24.6 million, a 179% rise, with gross margins near 86% from high-margin systems and cloud. Early 2026 bookings topped $32.8 million, surpassing full-year 2025 figures, though annual bookings fell 22% due to lumpy system sales. Over 135 customers drive demand, backed by $884 million liquidity. Performance reflects niche strength in annealing but faces scalability questions versus universal models, with a beta near 2 contributing to swings.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing bots from its library of over 351 AI Trading Bots, which analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors to generate real-time signals for copy trading. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—like volatility in growth areas such as semiconductors, space infrastructure, and leveraged ETFs—earn a spot among the 25 featured trending robots. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +285%, win rates up to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70, with strategies spanning 5-minute to 60-minute frames, trend analysis, and multi-agent approaches across 3–18 tickers per bot. Traders can explore signal agents, virtual agents with risk management, or brokerage-integrated copy trading options to outperform benchmarks. Visit Trending AI Robots to subscribe and deploy these high performers today.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IONQ and QBTS both operate in quantum computing but diverge in models: IONQ's trapped-ion gate-model enables universal applications with superior fidelity (99.99% two-qubit gates), while QBTS's annealing excels in optimization via hybrid solvers. Growth drivers favor IONQ's $470 million RPO and 202% revenue growth versus QBTS's $24.6 million and lumpy bookings. Recent momentum shows IONQ up 55% monthly on acquisitions, outpacing QBTS's 38–48% amid partnerships. Risks include high burn for both (betas 3+ and ~2), but IONQ offers broader sector exposure via cloud integrations. Sentiment tilts to IONQ's scalability, though QBTS trades at a higher price-to-sales multiple, highlighting trade-offs in near-term commercialization versus long-term platform potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IONQ due to its consistent revenue scaling, expansive backlog, technical fidelity leadership, and stronger monthly momentum in quantum trends. With probabilities weighted toward gate-model versatility and partnerships, IONQ shows relative stability and catalysts like raised guidance, though QBTS holds upside from annealing niches and bookings. Monitor Q1 results for shifts in positioning.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IONQ vs. QBTS commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IONQ is a Hold and QBTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (IONQ: $55.87 vs. QBTS: $22.35)
Brand notoriety: IONQ and QBTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Processing Hardware industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IONQ: 147% vs. QBTS: 176%
Market capitalization -- IONQ: $20.85B vs. QBTS: $8.28B
IONQ [@Computer Processing Hardware] is valued at $20.85B. QBTS’s [@Computer Processing Hardware] market capitalization is $8.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry ranges from $181.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Processing Hardware] industry is $17.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IONQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQBTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IONQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IONQ is a better buy in the long-term than QBTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IONQ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QBTS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IONQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QBTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both IONQ and QBTS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

IONQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +16.40% price change this week, while QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +3.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

IONQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Processing Hardware (+1.16% weekly)

Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IONQ($20.9B) has a higher market cap than QBTS($8.28B). IONQ YTD gains are higher at: 24.515 vs. QBTS (-14.532). QBTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -348.74M vs. IONQ (-710.97M). IONQ has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. QBTS (884M). IONQ has less debt than QBTS: IONQ (30.4M) vs QBTS (43.5M). IONQ has higher revenues than QBTS: IONQ (187M) vs QBTS (24.6M).
IONQQBTSIONQ / QBTS
Capitalization20.9B8.28B252%
EBITDA-710.97M-348.74M204%
Gain YTD24.515-14.532-169%
P/E Ratio143.26N/A-
Revenue187M24.6M760%
Total Cash2.03B884M230%
Total Debt30.4M43.5M70%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IONQQBTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IONQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QBTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQGU26.250.18
+0.69%
GQG US Equity ETF
PSCF61.50N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
HFGO28.99-0.13
-0.44%
Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF
PML7.56-0.05
-0.66%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
ORCU14.71-1.11
-7.02%
Direxion Daily ORCL Bull 2X ETF

IONQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IONQ has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IONQ jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IONQ
1D Price
Change %
IONQ100%
-1.79%
RGTI - IONQ
80%
Closely correlated
-7.02%
QBTS - IONQ
75%
Closely correlated
-6.99%
QUBT - IONQ
70%
Closely correlated
+15.72%
QMCO - IONQ
51%
Loosely correlated
-8.59%
CAN - IONQ
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More