QBTX
Price
$6.00
Change
+$0.09 (+1.52%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
68.85M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$69.63
Change
+$1.13 (+1.65%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
8.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QBTX vs SSO

QBTX vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • QBTX delivers 2x daily exposure to a single quantum computing stock (QBTS), while SSO provides 2x daily exposure to the broad S&P 500 index, creating fundamentally different risk and diversification profiles.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged strategies using derivatives such as swaps, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical trading rather than long-term buy-and-hold portfolios.
  • QBTX carries a higher expense ratio of 1.30% compared to SSO’s approximately 0.87%, reflecting the specialized nature of single-stock leveraged products.
  • QBTX offers concentrated thematic exposure to quantum computing technology with very few holdings, whereas SSO provides diversified exposure across large-cap U.S. equities across multiple sectors.
  • Structural differences in underlying assets lead to distinct volatility patterns, with QBTX exhibiting higher idiosyncratic risk tied to one company and SSO reflecting broader market movements.
  • Investors seeking amplified broad-market participation may consider SSO, while those with high-conviction views on a specific technology theme may evaluate QBTX for short-term positioning.

Introduction

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) both utilize daily-reset leverage to amplify returns, yet they target markedly different underlying exposures. QBTX focuses on a single emerging technology stock, while SSO tracks a broad market index. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead represent alternative leveraged strategies that may appeal to investors seeking amplified exposure within technology themes or across the overall U.S. equity market. The comparison highlights how structural choices influence risk, cost, and positioning in varying market environments.

Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) Overview

The Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (200%) the daily performance of D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS). Launched in April 2025, the fund primarily achieves its objective through total return swap agreements, with potential use of listed options or direct holdings in the underlying stock. It maintains a small number of holdings, typically centered on derivatives and cash positions. The expense ratio stands at 1.30%. As a non-diversified, single-asset leveraged product, QBTX provides concentrated exposure to the quantum computing sector within the broader technology industry. Its daily reset mechanism requires active monitoring for positions held beyond one trading day.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

The ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (200%) the daily performance of the S&P 500 index. Established in 2006, the fund employs derivatives such as total return swaps and futures contracts to gain synthetic exposure to the index’s approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies. It maintains a diversified holdings profile through these instruments, supported by cash equivalents. The expense ratio is approximately 0.87%. SSO operates as a passive leveraged product with daily rebalancing, offering broad market exposure across sectors including technology, financials, healthcare, and consumer discretionary. Its structure suits tactical allocation to overall U.S. equity market movements.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the U.S. equity market but address different segments of investor interest. QBTX aligns with the emerging quantum computing theme, a subset of the technology sector that benefits from advances in computing power, government research funding, and enterprise adoption of specialized hardware. SSO reflects the broader large-cap U.S. equity environment, which responds to macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate earnings growth, and sector rotation. Capital flows into technology have influenced both products, though QBTX faces additional volatility from single-company developments while SSO captures diversified index-level trends. Regulatory clarity around derivatives usage and leveraged products remains a consistent consideration for these structures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, QBTX has demonstrated amplified movements tied to the performance trajectory of its underlying single stock, resulting in elevated volatility compared to broad-market leveraged products. SSO has tracked amplified S&P 500 returns, benefiting from diversification across multiple sectors during periods of broad equity strength while experiencing drawdowns in market corrections. The single-asset focus of QBTX introduces greater idiosyncratic risk, whereas SSO’s index-based approach provides relative stability through sector balance. Over recent weeks and months, positioning differences have highlighted how thematic concentration versus broad exposure influences sensitivity to earnings cycles, macroeconomic shifts, and sector-specific momentum. Both products reset daily, underscoring their role in short-term tactical strategies rather than extended holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Its lower expense ratio, established track record since 2006, and diversified exposure across the S&P 500 index provide greater cost efficiency and reduced single-asset risk compared to the more concentrated, higher-cost profile of Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The broad-market leverage in SSO aligns with more consistent sector momentum across recent cycles, while QBTX’s thematic single-stock focus introduces elevated volatility and higher fees. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of structural strength and risk exposure rather than investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QBTX vs. SSO commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QBTX is a Hold and SSO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.77B vs. QBTX (68.9M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than QBTX: SSO (20.715) vs QBTX (-81.862). QBTX was incepted earlier than SSO: QBTX (1 year) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than QBTX (1.31). SSO has a higher turnover QBTX (0.00) vs QBTX (0.00).
QBTXSSOQBTX / SSO
Gain YTD-81.86220.715-395%
Net Assets68.9M8.77B1%
Total Expense Ratio1.310.87151%
Turnover0.0012.00-
Yield68.680.6410,679%
Fund Existence1 year20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QBTXSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
QBTX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTEK1.050.03
+2.94%
Maris-Tech Ltd
SABR2.170.04
+1.88%
Sabre Corp
NUTR9.00N/A
N/A
NusaTrip Inc
ED106.46-0.27
-0.25%
Consolidated Edison
NWE69.24-0.77
-1.10%
NorthWestern Energy Group

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
+1.65%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%