Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.95
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.61M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.17
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QCBGX (294M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.15) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. QCBGX (3.14). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.76 vs. QCBGX (20.94).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.31 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.31 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.913 | 12.515 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.15 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 8.68 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.21 | 40.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 38.76 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.55 | 71.09 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement