Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.94M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.14
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. QCBGX (287M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.17) vs QCBGX (0.62). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.34 vs. QCBGX (4.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.06 vs. QCBGX (16.97).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.31 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.31 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 9.479 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 8.34 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 27.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | 34.06 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.63 | 59.14 | 70% |