Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.70
Change-$0.49 (-2.31%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.94
Change-$0.82 (-2.36%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. QCBGX (246M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.59) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QCBGX (104.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. QCBGX (9.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.83 vs. QCBGX (16.29).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.549 | 10.911 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 241B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.59 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 11.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.50 | 10.12 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.29 | 28.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.38 | 40.93 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...