Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QCBGX (328M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.11) vs QCBGX (0.58). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (21 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. QCBGX (3.66). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.89 vs. QCBGX (2.79).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.468 | 8.853 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.11 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 12.28 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.43 | 38.94 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.79 | 29.89 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.89 | 76.13 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement