Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBAX
QCBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 141.46B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 335.55M to 282.59B. RLBAX holds the highest valuation in this group at 282.59B. The lowest valued company is QCBGX at 335.55M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 8%. RLBAX experienced the highest price growth at -0%, while QCBGX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
QCBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. QCBGX (336M). RLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBAX (1.12) vs QCBGX (0.57). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QCBGX (21 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.32). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. QCBGX (3.19). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. QCBGX (1.28).
| QCBGX | RLBAX | QCBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 1.32 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.275 | 9.393 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.12 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.19 | 10.38 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.63 | 39.16 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.28 | 27.64 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.54 | 74.16 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers