Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.83M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$33.92
Change+$0.12 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.71B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 233B vs. QCBGX (255M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.65) vs QCBGX (0.65). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QCBGX (68.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. QCBGX (-2.14). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.12 vs. QCBGX (36.40).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.628 | -0.323 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 255M | 233B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.65 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 2.54 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.21 | 10.84 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.40 | 48.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.16 | 48.85 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...