Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.94M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. QCBGX (287M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.56) vs QCBGX (0.62). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. QCBGX (4.45). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. QCBGX (16.97).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 9.802 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.56 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 8.87 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 28.91 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | 36.58 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.63 | 63.31 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers