Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.79M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.14
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. QCBGX (260M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.70) vs QCBGX (0.67). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. QCBGX (-0.06). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.93 vs. QCBGX (21.42).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.483 | 0.323 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.06 | 4.39 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.43 | 20.95 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.42 | 34.93 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.28 | 48.02 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...