Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.96
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.62M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.68
Change-$0.09 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. QCBGX (299M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.49) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.62 vs. QCBGX (3.13). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.56 vs. QCBGX (18.72).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.251 | 14.158 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.49 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 9.62 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.45 | 49.82 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.72 | 40.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.31 | 73.29 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement