Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.67
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.26M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QCBGX (303M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.46) vs QCBGX (0.60). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. QCBGX (-0.65). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.24 vs. QCBGX (12.52).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.89 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.464 | 13.420 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | 8.46 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 39.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.52 | 36.24 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.00 | 67.41 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement