Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBCX
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBCX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$23.02
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.72M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.39
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.06B
QCBGX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QCBGX (293M). RLBCX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBCX (1.53) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBCX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. QCBGX (4.02). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 40.28 vs. QCBGX (20.58).
| QCBGX | RLBCX | QCBGX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.89 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.816 | 13.071 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.53 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 9.50 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.66 | 42.14 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.58 | 40.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.38 | 76.06 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement