Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.94M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. QCBGX (287M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.08) vs QCBGX (0.62). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. QCBGX (4.45). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.10 vs. QCBGX (16.97).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.223 | 10.185 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 2.08 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | 9.54 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.85 | 30.96 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.97 | 40.10 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.63 | 69.34 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers