Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$21.25
Change-$0.25 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.17M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.39
Change-$0.35 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets242.17B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 242B vs. QCBGX (252M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.50) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QCBGX (104.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. QCBGX (4.96). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.70 vs. QCBGX (14.01).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.607 | 2.908 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 242B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.96 | 9.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.73 | 18.32 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.01 | 31.70 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.46 | 55.11 | 57% |