Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.97
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.61M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.69
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.25B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. QCBGX (294M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.05) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. QCBGX (3.36). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.27 vs. QCBGX (20.45).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.154 | 13.349 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 2.05 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 9.77 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.49 | 44.38 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.45 | 44.27 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.88 | 82.55 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement