Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.68M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.04B
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. QCBGX (283M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.10) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). QCBGX (2.12) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. QCBGX (5.27). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.09 vs. QCBGX (19.05).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 0.29 | 731% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.160 | 8.955 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.10 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.27 | 10.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.21 | 34.76 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.05 | 41.09 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.05 | 68.88 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement