Ad is loading...
QCBGX vs RLBFX
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLBFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$20.70
Change-$0.49 (-2.31%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.31
Change-$0.82 (-2.33%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
QCBGX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLBFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 241B vs. QCBGX (246M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLBFX (2.50) vs QCBGX (0.63). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: QCBGX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. QCBGX (104.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLBFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.81 vs. QCBGX (9.33). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.29 vs. QCBGX (16.29).
| QCBGX | RLBFX | QCBGX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.549 | 11.792 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 246M | 241B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 2.50 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 12.81 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.50 | 12.40 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.29 | 34.29 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.38 | 48.83 | 70% |