Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCBGX vs RLEFX
QCBGX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts QCBGX vs RLEFX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced C
Price$22.58
Change-$0.37 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.58M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.31
Change-$0.62 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.29B
QCBGX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCBGX vs. RLEFX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCBGX is a Buy and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. QCBGX (293M). RLEFX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: RLEFX (1.92) vs QCBGX (0.61). QCBGX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: QCBGX (20 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: RLEFX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. QCBGX (1.96). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.85 vs. QCBGX (17.72).
| QCBGX | RLEFX | QCBGX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.39 | 541% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.39 | 541% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.816 | 12.846 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 7.65 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.91 | 51.34 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.72 | 40.85 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement