Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGEBX
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGEBX
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. QCLGX (5.67B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: QCLGX (21 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGEBX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.29 vs. RGEBX (5.16). QCLGX return over 5 years is better than : 13.83 vs. RGEBX (12.23).
| QCLGX | RGEBX | QCLGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.08 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.683 | 7.631 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.67B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.29 | 5.16 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.62 | 40.43 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.83 | 12.23 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.66 | 101.11 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement