Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLGX vs RGEBX
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLGX vs RGEBX
QCLGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. QCLGX (5.66B). QCLGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . QCLGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: QCLGX (21 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). QCLGX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). QCLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLGX: RGEBX (250) vs QCLGX (1500). QCLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.88 vs. RGEBX (13.12). QCLGX return over 5 years is better than : 27.03 vs. RGEBX (19.55).
| QCLGX | RGEBX | QCLGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.08 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.862 | 9.875 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.66B | 338B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.88 | 13.12 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.52 | 49.58 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.03 | 19.55 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.90 | 103.28 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement