Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. QCLVX (2.59B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (1.04) vs QCLVX (0.03). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). QCLVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). QCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. QCLVX (11.45).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.07 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.892 | 5.801 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.06 | 9.98 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.81 | 34.14 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.45 | 32.93 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers