Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMEBX
QCLVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. QCLVX (2.81B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMEBX (0.99) vs QCLVX (0.03). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: QCLVX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). QCLVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMEBX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). QCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.78 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. QCLVX (20.82).
| QCLVX | RMEBX | QCLVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 1.07 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.545 | 9.416 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.99 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.78 | 8.96 | 243% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.19 | 32.63 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 36.13 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers