Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$35.18
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. QCLVX (1.98B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. QCLVX (0.33). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. QCLVX (37.04).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.110 | 14.964 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.33 | 7.44 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 43.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.04 | 60.80 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement