Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$34.75
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. QCLVX (1.97B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.21) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. QCLVX (-4.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. QCLVX (27.47).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.555 | 12.783 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.21 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.20 | 6.00 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.79 | 27.94 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.47 | 52.67 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement