Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$32.89
Change+$0.29 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. QCLVX (1.66B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.31) vs QCLVX (0.20). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (7 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. QCLVX (1.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.66 vs. QCLVX (27.43).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.574 | 5.919 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 105B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.31 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 9.01 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.21 | 17.82 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.43 | 51.66 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |