Ad is loading...
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$31.36
Change+$0.15 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. QCLVX (1.56B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.37) vs QCLVX (0.21). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (7 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. QCLVX (-2.57). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. QCLVX (37.02).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.073 | 1.270 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.37 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.57 | 5.35 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 17.29 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.02 | 56.16 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...