Ad is loading...
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$29.72
Change+$0.17 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. QCLVX (1.45B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.34) vs QCLVX (0.21). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (7 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. QCLVX (-3.29). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.78 vs. QCLVX (32.53).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.170 | -3.342 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 96.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.34 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.29 | 3.42 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.85 | 5.55 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.53 | 48.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...