Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$33.69
Change-$0.36 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$58.96
Change-$0.50 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. QCLVX (1.83B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs QCLVX (0.19). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. QCLVX (2.98). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.18 vs. QCLVX (35.19).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.104 | 8.675 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 108B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.26 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.98 | 6.95 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.41 | 25.63 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.19 | 56.18 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers