Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value C
Price$34.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.9B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. QCLVX (1.9B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs QCLVX (0.19). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). QCLVX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. QCLVX (2.50). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.21 vs. QCLVX (33.48).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.91 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.472 | 11.642 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.9B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.26 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.50 | 6.98 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.43 | 29.24 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.48 | 54.21 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement