Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFCX
QCLVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. QCLVX (2.59B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFCX (1.19) vs QCLVX (0.03). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). QCLVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFCX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). QCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. QCLVX (11.45).
| QCLVX | RMFCX | QCLVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.91 | 207% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.892 | 6.510 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.19 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.06 | 10.31 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.81 | 35.49 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.45 | 34.04 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers