Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QCLVX vs RMFEX
QCLVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts QCLVX vs RMFEX
QCLVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QCLVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCLVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. QCLVX (2.59B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than QCLVX: RMFEX (1.45) vs QCLVX (0.03). QCLVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: QCLVX (8 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). QCLVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). QCLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCLVX: RMFEX (250) vs QCLVX (1500). QCLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.06 vs. RMFEX (10.65). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.15 vs. QCLVX (11.45).
| QCLVX | RMFEX | QCLVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.62 | 292% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.88 | 0.62 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.892 | 6.631 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 115B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.06 | 10.65 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.81 | 36.78 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.45 | 36.15 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers