QCOM
Price
$163.30
Change
+$3.71 (+2.32%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
174.89B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TER
Price
$158.91
Change
+$3.01 (+1.93%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
24.89B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QCOM vs TER

Header iconQCOM vs TER Comparison
Open Charts QCOM vs TERBanner chart's image
QUALCOMM
Price$163.30
Change+$3.71 (+2.32%)
Volume$10.82M
Capitalization174.89B
Teradyne
Price$158.91
Change+$3.01 (+1.93%)
Volume$3.87M
Capitalization24.89B
QCOM vs TER Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QCOM vs. TER commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QCOM is a Hold and TER is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (QCOM: $163.30 vs. TER: $158.91)
Brand notoriety: QCOM and TER are both notable
QCOM represents the Semiconductors, while TER is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QCOM: 101% vs. TER: 102%
Market capitalization -- QCOM: $174.89B vs. TER: $24.89B
QCOM [@Semiconductors] is valued at $174.89B. TER’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $24.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.35T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $398.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $96.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $30.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QCOM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTER’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QCOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TER’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the long-term than TER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QCOM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TER’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TER’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TER is a better buy in the short-term than QCOM.

Price Growth

QCOM (@Semiconductors) experienced а -6.14% price change this week, while TER (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -6.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.57%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -4.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

TER is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-4.16% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (-4.66% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($175B) has a higher market cap than TER($24.9B). TER has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: TER (57.79) vs QCOM (32.59). TER YTD gains are higher at: 26.653 vs. QCOM (8.128). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.6B vs. TER (648M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. TER (298M). TER has less debt than QCOM: TER (68.8M) vs QCOM (14.8B). QCOM has higher revenues than TER: QCOM (43.3B) vs TER (2.86B).
QCOMTERQCOM / TER
Capitalization175B24.9B703%
EBITDA14.6B648M2,253%
Gain YTD8.12826.65330%
P/E Ratio32.5957.7956%
Revenue43.3B2.86B1,514%
Total Cash10B298M3,356%
Total Debt14.8B68.8M21,512%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QCOM vs TER: Fundamental Ratings
QCOM
TER
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6554
SMR RATING
1..100
2151
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (13) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TER (69) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TER’s over the last 12 months.

TER's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (65) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TER’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TER (51) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

TER's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QCOM (54) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that TER’s stock grew somewhat faster than QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as TER (9) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to TER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QCOMTER
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTF35.950.51
+1.44%
iShares International Equity Factor ETF
JULP29.980.13
+0.44%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jul
OVLH38.820.10
+0.27%
Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF
GBAB14.960.04
+0.23%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
SSPX31.47N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson US Sustainable EquityETF

TER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TER has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TER jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TER
1D Price
Change %
TER100%
+1.93%
STM - TER
74%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
TXN - TER
72%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
RMBS - TER
72%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
NXPI - TER
71%
Closely correlated
+3.89%
ADI - TER
71%
Closely correlated
+3.16%
More