Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QFVIX vs TRIGX
QFVIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts QFVIX vs TRIGX
QFVIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QFVIX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QFVIX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. QFVIX (1.49B). QFVIX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: QFVIX (3.64) vs TRIGX (2.29). QFVIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: QFVIX (28 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). QFVIX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). QFVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than QFVIX: TRIGX (2500) vs QFVIX (1000000). QFVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.81 vs. TRIGX (27.55). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.83 vs. QFVIX (55.62).
| QFVIX | TRIGX | QFVIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.81 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.81 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.891 | 17.325 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 17.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 2.29 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.81 | 27.55 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.37 | 92.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.62 | 95.83 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.38 | 156.78 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement