Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QFVOX vs TRIGX
QFVOX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts QFVOX vs TRIGX
QFVOX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QFVOX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QFVOX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. QFVOX (1.52B). QFVOX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: QFVOX (3.41) vs TRIGX (2.38). QFVOX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: QFVOX (28 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). QFVOX (1.51) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). QFVOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). QFVOX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. QFVOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.16 vs. TRIGX (31.40). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 90.55 vs. QFVOX (52.66).
| QFVOX | TRIGX | QFVOX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.81 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 0.81 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.750 | 11.775 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 16.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 2.38 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.16 | 31.40 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.97 | 74.69 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 90.55 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.60 | 152.91 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers