Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QICNX vs TRIGX
QICNX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts QICNX vs TRIGX
QICNX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QICNX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QICNX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. QICNX (998M). QICNX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: QICNX (2.55) vs TRIGX (2.38). QICNX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: QICNX (13 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). QICNX (1.67) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). QICNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). QICNX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. QICNX (16.98). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.54 vs. QICNX (56.10).
| QICNX | TRIGX | QICNX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.81 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.81 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.662 | 12.868 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 998M | 17B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 2.38 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.98 | 28.36 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.65 | 83.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.10 | 92.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.67 | 156.57 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement