QIND
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
29.79M
RCHN
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

QIND vs RCHN

Header iconQIND vs RCHN Comparison
Open Charts QIND vs RCHNBanner chart's image
Quality Industrial
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$628.83K
Capitalization29.79M
Rouchon Industries
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
QIND vs RCHN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QIND vs. RCHN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QIND is a Buy and RCHN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (QIND: $0.02 vs. RCHN: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: QIND and RCHN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QIND: 143% vs. RCHN: 0%
Market capitalization -- QIND: $29.79M vs. RCHN: $0
QIND [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $29.79M. RCHN’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QIND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRCHN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RCHN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QIND is a better buy in the long-term than RCHN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RCHN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RCHN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCHN is a better buy in the short-term than QIND.

Price Growth

QIND (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +39.24% price change this week, while RCHN (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

QIND is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.12% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCHN YTD gains are higher at: -59.454 vs. QIND (-63.333).
QINDRCHNQIND / RCHN
Capitalization29.8MN/A-
EBITDA13.8MN/A-
Gain YTD-63.333-59.454107%
P/E Ratio3.16N/A-
Revenue83.8MN/A-
Total Cash1.23MN/A-
Total Debt47.9MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QIND vs RCHN: Fundamental Ratings
QIND
RCHN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
733
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QIND's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCHN (98). This means that QIND’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCHN’s over the last 12 months.

QIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCHN (100). This means that QIND’s stock grew similarly to RCHN’s over the last 12 months.

QIND's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCHN (100). This means that QIND’s stock grew significantly faster than RCHN’s over the last 12 months.

QIND's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RCHN (65). This means that QIND’s stock grew similarly to RCHN’s over the last 12 months.

RCHN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QIND (98). This means that RCHN’s stock grew significantly faster than QIND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QINDRCHN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RCHN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBX14.571.54
+11.82%
MBX Biosciences Inc.
BBWI31.560.13
+0.41%
Bath & Body Works
XHG1.33-0.01
-0.86%
Xchange TEC Inc
KGS31.27-0.53
-1.67%
Kodiak Gas Services
IROH11.21-0.75
-6.27%
Iron Horse Acquisitions Corp

QIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QIND and CHHGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIND and CHHGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QIND
1D Price
Change %
QIND100%
+13.05%
CHHGF - QIND
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCHN - QIND
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREMF - QIND
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIZOF - QIND
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLFF - QIND
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More

RCHN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCHN and DAWIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCHN and DAWIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCHN
1D Price
Change %
RCHN100%
N/A
DAWIF - RCHN
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRXXY - RCHN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QIND - RCHN
24%
Poorly correlated
+13.05%
WEIGF - RCHN
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.57%
QWTR - RCHN
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More