Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBAX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced R6
Price$22.90
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.25M
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.54
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.77B
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. QKBGX (278M). QKBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QKBGX (1.49) vs RLBAX (1.18). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than QKBGX (1.06). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. QKBGX (3.37). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. QKBGX (24.89).
| QKBGX | RLBAX | QKBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.31 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.352 | 7.710 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 252B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.18 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 6.23 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.36 | 33.46 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.89 | 34.69 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.89 | 55.43 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement