Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. QKBGX (331M). QKBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QKBGX (1.35) vs RLBAX (1.14). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QKBGX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than QKBGX (1.05). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. QKBGX (8.75). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. QKBGX (12.24).
| QKBGX | RLBAX | QKBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.32 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.32 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.391 | 9.354 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.14 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 16.80 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.41 | 42.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.24 | 31.17 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.34 | 77.06 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement