Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts QKBGX vs RLBAX
QKBGX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QKBGX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QKBGX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QKBGX (329M). QKBGX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: QKBGX (1.35) vs RLBAX (1.11). QKBGX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: QKBGX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than QKBGX (1.05). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: QKBGX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. QKBGX (5.40). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. QKBGX (9.84).
| QKBGX | RLBAX | QKBGX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.32 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.32 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.571 | 8.124 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.11 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 11.17 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.46 | 36.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.84 | 28.90 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.29 | 72.56 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement