Investors seeking amplified exposure to U.S. large-cap equities often evaluate leveraged ETFs that target major benchmarks. QLD and SPUU both provide 2x daily leverage but pursue different indices, making them relevant alternatives for those aiming to magnify returns within the technology-driven or broad-market segments. They do not compete directly but offer complementary strategies for investors with bullish views on U.S. equities who accept the heightened risks of daily-reset leverage.
ProShares Ultra QQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund holds approximately 100-112 positions through a combination of equity securities and derivatives. Top holdings mirror the index leaders, including significant allocations to NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp. Sector allocations show heavy concentration in technology (approximately 59%), followed by communication services and consumer cyclical. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. As a passive leveraged ETF, it employs swaps and other instruments to achieve its daily target, with daily rebalancing inherent to the leveraged structure.
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X Shares seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund provides exposure to the 500 large-cap U.S. companies in the index via derivatives. Top holdings reflect S&P 500 weights, led by NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp. Sector breakdown features information technology at approximately 39%, with meaningful allocations to financial services, communication services, and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.60%. This passive leveraged ETF resets daily through swaps and futures to maintain the 2x target.
Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity market, influenced by macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate earnings growth, and sector rotation. Technology leadership, driven by artificial intelligence advancements and innovation cycles among index heavyweights, continues to shape capital flows. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy, along with broader economic indicators, affect sentiment. Risks include elevated valuations in growth sectors and potential volatility from geopolitical or monetary policy shifts. The environment favors leveraged products during periods of sustained upward trends but amplifies losses during downturns.
In recent market cycles, QLD has demonstrated greater sensitivity to technology sector momentum due to its Nasdaq-100 focus, resulting in higher volatility compared with the broader S&P 500 exposure of SPUU. During earnings seasons dominated by mega-cap technology companies, QLD tends to experience amplified moves. SPUU provides more balanced participation across sectors, potentially offering smoother relative performance in diversified rallies. Both funds' daily-reset mechanisms cause performance to diverge from simple multiples of benchmark returns over longer periods, particularly in volatile or sideways markets. Investors position QLD for concentrated growth bets and SPUU for leveraged broad-market participation.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest preference to SPUU in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio and broader diversification across the S&P 500 reduce concentration risk relative to the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 focus of QLD. Cost efficiency and a more balanced sector profile support greater consistency in trend-following scenarios, though both products carry substantial leverage-related risks that require careful position sizing.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| QLD | SPUU | QLD / SPUU | |
| Gain YTD | 38.760 | 16.719 | 232% |
| Net Assets | 14.6B | 245M | 5,959% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.60 | 158% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 37.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 1.33 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| QLD | SPUU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 73% Closely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| NVDA - QLD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| KLAC - QLD | 68% Closely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| AMAT - QLD | 67% Closely correlated | +3.74% | ||
| ASML - QLD | 66% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||