QLD
Price
$86.50
Change
-$3.62 (-4.02%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$69.25
Change
-$4.47 (-6.06%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
34.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QLD vs TQQQ

Header iconQLD vs TQQQ Comparison
Open Charts QLD vs TQQQBanner chart's image
QLD vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs seek daily leveraged exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index but differ in leverage magnitude: ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) targets 2x daily returns while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) targets 3x daily returns.
  • Expense ratios favor TQQQ slightly at a net 0.82% compared to QLD’s net 0.95%, reflecting modest differences in cost efficiency for long-term holding considerations.
  • Both funds are structured as leveraged exchange-traded funds using derivatives such as swaps and futures for daily reset exposure, resulting in high volatility and potential compounding effects over multiple periods.
  • Holdings and sector allocations mirror the Nasdaq-100 Index, with heavy concentration in technology and communication services sectors, though the leveraged structure amplifies exposure to top constituents like NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp.
  • Risk profiles diverge significantly due to leverage levels, with TQQQ exhibiting greater sensitivity to market movements and higher potential for decay in sideways or volatile markets compared to QLD.
  • Both serve as tactical tools for short-term bullish views on large-cap growth stocks rather than core long-term holdings, given their daily reset mechanics and structural characteristics.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) represent two distinct leveraged strategies targeting the same underlying benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. They do not compete directly as substitutes but instead offer investors graduated levels of amplified daily exposure to technology-heavy large-cap growth equities. This comparison highlights structural differences in leverage, cost, and risk, helping investors evaluate their suitability within broader portfolio positioning amid ongoing sector momentum in technology and innovation-driven markets.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund employs a passive strategy with daily rebalancing through derivatives including total return swaps and futures contracts. It typically holds exposure to approximately 100–110 underlying index components indirectly via these instruments. Top holdings exposure aligns closely with Nasdaq-100 leaders such as NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., and Microsoft Corp. Sector allocations concentrate in technology (roughly 50%+), communication services, and consumer discretionary. The net expense ratio stands at 0.95%. Distinguishing features include its 2x leverage profile, which provides moderate amplification suitable for tactical allocation while maintaining the daily reset mechanism common to leveraged products.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Like its counterpart, it follows a passive approach with daily rebalancing implemented primarily through swaps and other derivatives. Holdings exposure encompasses around 110–124 Nasdaq-100 components indirectly. Top positions reflect the index’s concentration in NVIDIA Corp., Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and similar leaders. Sector breakdown mirrors the benchmark with dominant weighting in technology (over 50%), communication services, and consumer cyclical areas. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. Key structural attributes include its higher 3x leverage, which intensifies both upside potential and downside risk relative to lower-leverage alternatives, alongside the standard daily target reset.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Nasdaq-100 Index, which underpins both ETFs, reflects a concentrated thematic environment centered on large-cap technology, internet, and innovation-driven companies. Macro drivers include interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles in artificial intelligence and cloud computing, and broader capital flows into growth equities. Regulatory developments around technology competition and data privacy, along with geopolitical factors affecting semiconductor supply chains, influence sector dynamics. Risks encompass valuation compression in high-growth names, potential shifts in monetary policy, and economic slowdowns that could pressure earnings momentum. These elements create an environment where leveraged products can magnify both sector advances and corrections over market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the higher-leverage structure of ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has produced greater volatility and amplified returns during strong Nasdaq-100 advances compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Both ETFs benefit from favorable sector rotation toward technology and growth stocks but experience pronounced drawdowns during periods of market stress or sideways trading due to daily resets and compounding effects. TQQQ’s elevated beta profile positions it for more aggressive tactical exposure, while QLD offers a relatively moderated risk-adjusted approach within the same thematic universe. Relative positioning favors consideration of leverage tolerance, with TQQQ exhibiting stronger momentum capture in bullish phases but heightened sensitivity to interest rate shifts and earnings variability among top holdings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights on leveraged ETFs and sector exposure may find the platform useful for refining strategies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower net expense ratio, comparable diversification within the leveraged framework, and consistent alignment with Nasdaq-100 momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) for investors with higher risk tolerance seeking amplified exposure. However, the choice remains highly dependent on individual leverage capacity and market regime, with both ETFs demonstrating strong thematic fit in growth-oriented environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
QLD vs. TQQQ commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QLD is a Hold and TQQQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 34.8B vs. QLD (13.5B). TQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: TQQQ (40.063) vs QLD (28.020). QLD was incepted earlier than TQQQ: QLD (20 years) vs TQQQ (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95). TQQQ has a higher turnover QLD (16.00) vs QLD (16.00).
QLDTQQQQLD / TQQQ
Gain YTD28.02040.06370%
Net Assets13.5B34.8B39%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.82116%
Turnover16.0025.0064%
Yield0.120.3732%
Fund Existence20 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QLDTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHI50.941.08
+2.17%
iShares US Medical Devices ETF
GQRE64.180.89
+1.41%
FlexShares Glbl Quality Real Estate ETF
SAGP34.850.08
+0.23%
Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF
MYCM24.48N/A
N/A
State Street® My2033 Corporate Bond ETF
GLNK6.97-0.18
-2.52%
Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF